Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
SHIP›Shift-left PenTest

Pentest findings on every PR. Not once a quarter.

Traditional pentests happen once or twice a year and find issues that have been in production for months. O3 runs continuous, automated penetration testing on every code change — so you catch exploitable issues before they ship.

Start for freeSee it in action
CONTINUOUS COVERAGE

Pentest on every PR. Not once a quarter.

Traditional pentests happen once or twice a year. O3 runs continuous automated penetration testing on every code change — catching exploitable issues before they ship.

Auth bypass on every new route
API endpoint fuzzing on every PR
OWASP Top 10 — every scan
Business logic tested before merge
O3 PenTest · PR #418
In progress
Pentest scan steps
✓OWASP Top 10 scan
Done
✓Auth bypass attempts
Done
✓REST / GraphQL fuzzing
Done
Business logic analysis
Running
○IDOR enumeration
Queued
Scan progress3 / 5 steps
EXPLOIT DEPTH

Business logic flaws. IDOR. Caught before merge.

O3 doesn't just look at code patterns — it attempts real exploits against a sandboxed replica. If it's exploitable, you know before the merge.

Price manipulation flows tested end-to-end
IDOR on every new resource endpoint
Privilege escalation paths exercised
Full exploit proof — not just a flag
O3 PenTest · Finding #1
Exploit confirmed
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
GET /api/orders/{orderId} · CWE-284
CRITICAL

Any authenticated user can retrieve any order by incrementing orderId. Authorization check on userId is missing.

Exploit proof
# Attacker authenticated as user 9912
GET /api/orders/1 HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Bearer <user-9912-token>
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{"orderId":1,"userId":1001,"items":[...],"address":"...","card_last4":"4242"}
✓ Accessed order belonging to user 1001 — cross-account data leak confirmed
Remediation· O3 fix PR available

Add WHERE user_id = req.user.id to the order query, or verify order.userId === req.user.id before returning data.

AUTHENTICATION SURFACE

Auth bypass. JWT attacks. OAuth flaws. All tested.

O3 attempts to bypass login, session validation, JWT verification, OAuth flows, and MFA — covering the authentication surface that causes the most damaging breaches.

JWT algorithm confusion and signature stripping
Session fixation and CSRF attacks
OAuth state parameter attacks
MFA bypass via response manipulation
O3 Auth Bypass Testing
1 vuln found
Attack results
JWT signature stripped
BLOCKED
Session fixation
BLOCKED
OAuth state param omission
State param not validated — account takeover via CSRF
VULNERABLE
MFA bypass via response edit
BLOCKED
OAuth CSRF — state parameter not validated
GET /auth/callback?code=... · no state check

An attacker can initiate an OAuth flow, drop the state parameter, and trick the victim's browser into completing authorization — resulting in account takeover.

COMPLIANCE REPORTS

Audit-ready pentest reports. After every scan.

O3 generates a structured pentest report after every scan — findings, severity, proof-of-concept payloads, and remediation guidance — formatted for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and enterprise review boards.

Proof-of-concept payload included for every finding
Structured for SOC 2 and ISO 27001
Fix PR opened automatically for critical findings
Historical report archive per branch
O3 PenTest Report · PR #418
SOC 2 ready
Executive summary
1
Critical
2
High
4
Medium
7
Low
Findings
F-001IDOR on /api/orders/{id}
CRITICAL
F-002OAuth CSRF
HIGH
F-003Missing rate limit
HIGH
F-004Verbose stack traces
MEDIUM
Formatted for SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · enterprise review

Find exploitable flaws before QA does.

Book a demo and see O3's shift-left pentest surface real vulnerabilities across your codebase.

Book a Demo →
FAQ

Questions,
answered.

Everything teams ask before rolling this out. Still stuck? Reach our team.

  • Shift-left pentesting moves security testing earlier in the development lifecycle, specifically into the pull request stage, before code is merged to main. Traditional pentests happen once or twice a year after deployment; shift-left pentesting runs the same depth of testing on every code change, when findings are cheapest to fix and the developer who wrote the code is still in context.
  • O3 runs automated exploit attempts against a sandboxed replica of the changed code, not against your full production environment. Scans run in parallel with your existing CI jobs. Only the changed application surface is retested on each PR, full baseline scans run on a schedule. Most PR scans complete in under 3 minutes.
  • O3 covers the full OWASP Top 10: injection (SQL, NoSQL, command, LDAP), broken authentication, sensitive data exposure, XML external entities, broken access control, security misconfiguration, cross-site scripting, insecure deserialization, vulnerable components, and insufficient logging. Beyond OWASP, O3 tests business logic flaws like price manipulation, workflow bypass, and IDOR, vulnerabilities that require understanding application context, not just pattern matching.
  • SAST analyzes source code without running it. DAST sends HTTP requests to a running application and observes responses. O3 combines both: it uses static analysis to identify high-value targets, then attempts real exploits against a running replica. This means O3 can confirm exploitability, not just flag code patterns, while still running before production deployment. Business logic flaws that require chained API calls or application state cannot be found by SAST or simple DAST, but are within scope for O3.
  • O3 generates a structured pentest report after every scan that documents findings, severity, proof-of-concept payloads, and remediation steps, in a format suitable for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and enterprise security reviews. For many compliance frameworks, continuous automated testing with documented findings is accepted as equivalent to or supplementary to annual manual pentests. Your auditor or compliance team should confirm what their specific requirements accept.