Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf

HIGH

GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in @budibase/server. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Budibase: SSRF in AI Extract File Automation Step via Missing IP Blacklist Validation

Also known asCVE-2026-45548
Published
May 15, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 12, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs17th percentile — riskier than 17% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.0%0.3%0.3%0.3%Jun 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 358,265 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

1other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@budibase/servernpm
15Kdownloads / week

Description

Vulnerability Details

CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The processUrlFile function in packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts uses fetch(fileUrl) directly without the IP blacklist validation that is consistently applied to all other automation steps. This allows an authenticated user to trigger server-side requests to internal network addresses.

Vulnerable Code

packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts (lines 116, 139):

async function processUrlFile(fileUrl: string, ...): Promise<ExtractInput> {
  const response = await fetch(fileUrl)  // NO blacklist check!
  // ...
  const fallbackResponse = await fetch(fileUrl)  // Also NO blacklist check!
}

Contrast with All Other Automation Steps (Same Codebase)

Every other automation step that makes outbound HTTP requests properly uses fetchWithBlacklist:

  • steps/slack.ts:19: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})
  • steps/discord.ts:28: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})
  • steps/zapier.ts:33: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})
  • steps/n8n.ts:53: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, request)
  • steps/outgoingWebhook.ts: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})
  • steps/make.ts: response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})

The fetchWithBlacklist function (steps/utils.ts:100) validates URLs against the IP blacklist which blocks:

  • 127.0.0.0/8 (loopback)
  • 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16 (RFC1918 private)
  • 169.254.0.0/16 (link-local / cloud metadata)
  • IPv6 private addresses

The AI Extract File step bypasses all of these protections.

Steps to Reproduce

Via Budibase UI

  1. Login as builder user
  2. Create or open any app
  3. Go to Automations > New Automation
  4. Add trigger: App Action
  5. Add step: AI > Extract File Data
  6. Set Source: URL
  7. Set File URL: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ (or any internal IP)
  8. Click Run Test — the server makes the request without IP blacklist validation

Via curl (API)

# 1. Login and get session cookie
curl -s -c /tmp/bb.txt \
  "http://BUDIBASE_HOST/api/global/auth/default/login" \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"username":"YOUR_EMAIL","password":"YOUR_PASSWORD"}'

# 2. Create automation with SSRF payload (replace YOUR_APP_ID)
curl -s -b /tmp/bb.txt \
  "http://BUDIBASE_HOST/api/automations" \
  -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "x-budibase-app-id: YOUR_APP_ID" \
  -d '{"name":"SSRF PoC","definition":{"trigger":{"stepId":"APP","event":"row:save"},"steps":[{"stepId":"AI_EXTRACT","inputs":{"source":"URL","fileUrl":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"}}]}}'

Code Review Verification

Compare the vulnerable function with the safe pattern used everywhere else:

VULNERABLE (no blacklist):
  packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts:116
    const response = await fetch(fileUrl)

SAFE (with blacklist) - every other step:
  packages/server/src/automations/steps/slack.ts:19
    response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})
  packages/server/src/automations/steps/discord.ts:28
    response = await fetchWithBlacklist(url, {...})

Expected vs Actual Behavior

Expected: processUrlFile() should reject internal/private IPs via fetchWithBlacklist() Actual: fetch(fileUrl) is called directly, allowing requests to 127.0.0.1, 10.x.x.x, 169.254.169.254 etc.

Impact

An authenticated user with builder permissions can:

  • Access cloud metadata endpoints (AWS IAM credentials, GCP service tokens, Azure IMDS)
  • Scan internal network services and ports
  • Access internal APIs not intended for external access
  • Exfiltrate data from internal services via the automation response

In Budibase Cloud (SaaS), this could be used to steal cloud provider credentials, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

Proposed Fix

Replace fetch(fileUrl) with fetchWithBlacklist(fileUrl), consistent with all other automation steps:

import { fetchWithBlacklist } from "../utils"

async function processUrlFile(fileUrl: string, ...): Promise<ExtractInput> {
  const response = await fetchWithBlacklist(fileUrl)  // Use blacklist
  // ...
  const fallbackResponse = await fetchWithBlacklist(fileUrl)  // Use blacklist
}

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@budibase/serverall versions3.34.8

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @budibase/server. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update @budibase/server to 3.34.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Vulnerability Details **CWE-918**: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) The `processUrlFile` function in `packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts` uses `fetch(fileUrl)` directly **without the IP blacklist validation** that is consistently applied to all other automation steps. This allows an authenticated user to trigger server-side requests to internal network addresses. ### Vulnerable Code **`packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts` (lines 116, 139)**: ```typescript async function processUrlFile(fileUrl: string, ...): Promise<ExtractInput> { const response = a
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-rpj4-7x2v-wjrf: @budibase/server… | O3 Security