GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf — surrealdb
Fix: surrealdb/surrealdb#5597GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf is a CWE-835 vulnerability in surrealdb. A fix is available for surrealdb — see the affected versions and patch details below.
SurrealDB CPU exhaustion via custom functions result in total DoS
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
surrealdb🦀surrealdb🦀surrealdbReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
SurrealDB allows authenticated users with OWNER or EDITOR permissions at the root, database or namespace levels to define their own database functions using the DEFINE FUNCTION statement
A custom database function comprises a name together with a function body. In the function body, the user programs the functionality of the function in terms of SurrealQL. The language includes a FOR keyword, used to implement for-loops.
Whilst the parser and interpreter constrain the number of iterations for a single for-loop, nesting several for-loops with a large number of iterations is possible. Thus, an attacker could define a function that comprises several nested for-loops with an iteration count of 1.000.000 each.
Executing the function will consume all the CPU time of the server, timeouts configured will not break the CPU consumption, and the function execution monopolizes all CPU time of the SurrealDB server, effectively preventing the server from executing functions, queries, commands of other users, or allowing further connections being established to the server.
Terminating the stuck server requires manual intervention which forces a quit on the server process, as the server application is not responsive any longer.
This issue was discovered and patched during an code audit and penetration test of SurrealDB by cure53, the severity defined within cure53's preliminary finding is high, matched by our CVSS v4 assessment.
Impact
Denial of Service vulnerability resulting in a stuck SurrealDB server requiring manual restart.
Patches
A patch has been introduced that adds a check in the ForEachStatement that checks if the context has been cancelled or timed out for every iteration.
- Versions 2.0.5, 2.1.5, 2.2.2, and later are not affected by this issue.
Workarounds
For SurrealDB users that are unable to upgrade, consider setting the --allow-functions and/or --deny-functions options or corresponding SURREAL_CAPS_ALLOW_FUNC and/or SURREAL_CAPS_DENY_FUNC environment variables, documented within capabilities, to either block all custom functions, or only allow trusted functions to execute.
References
SurrealQL Documentation - DEFINE FUNCTION Statement SurrealQL Documentation - FOR Statement SurrealDB Documentation - Capabilities SurrealDB Documentation - Environment variables #5597
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | surrealdb | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.2.2 | 2.2.2cargo update -p surrealdb --precise 2.2.2 |
| 🦀crates.io | surrealdb | ≥ 2.1.0&&< 2.1.5 | 2.1.5cargo update -p surrealdb --precise 2.1.5 |
| 🦀crates.io | surrealdb | all versions | 2.0.5cargo update -p surrealdb --precise 2.0.5 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for surrealdb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update surrealdb to 2.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-pxw4-94j3-v9pf across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.