Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Path Traversal in AnsibleGHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m

MEDIUMFix: ansible/ansible#69023

GHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.6) Path Traversal vulnerability in ansible. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for ansible — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2020-1735PYSEC-2020-7
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Oct 11, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs39th percentile — riskier than 39% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.33%0.66%0.99%0.2%0.5%Apr 26Aug 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 385,738 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍ansible🐍ansible🐍ansible

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A flaw was found in the Ansible Engine when the fetch module is used. An attacker could intercept the module, inject a new path, and then choose a new destination path on the controller node. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIansible≥ 2.7.0a1&&< 2.7.182.7.18pip install --upgrade 'ansible==2.7.18'
🐍PyPIansible≥ 2.8.0a1&&< 2.8.122.8.12pip install --upgrade 'ansible==2.8.12'
🐍PyPIansible≥ 2.9.0a1&&< 2.9.82.9.8pip install --upgrade 'ansible==2.9.8'

Affected Products

6 products · 13 configurations
OS
debian linuxdebian
1 version
10.0
OS
fedorafedoraproject
3 versions
303132
Application
ansibleredhat
≥ 2.9.0 && < 2.9.7
range
Application
ansible towerredhat
≥ 3.6.0 && ≤ 3.6.3
range
Application
cloudforms management engineredhat
1 version
5.0
Application
openstackredhat
1 version
13
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ansible, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ansible to 2.7.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Ansible Engine 2.7.16, 2.8.10, and 2.9.6 as well as previous versions are affected. Ansible Tower 3.4.5, 3.5.5 and 3.6.3 as well as previous versions are affected. In Red Hat OpenStack Platform, because the flaw has a lower impact, ansible is not directly customer exposed, and the fix would require a substantial…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Currently, there is no mitigation for this issue except avoid using the affected fetch module when possible.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.7 for RHEL 7ansible-0:2.7.17-1.el7aeRHSA-2020:1544
Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.8 for RHEL 7ansible-0:2.8.11-1.el7aeRHSA-2020:1543
Red Hat Ansible Engine 2.9 for RHEL 7ansible-0:2.9.7-1.el7aeRHSA-2020:1541
Red Hat Ansible Engine 2 for RHEL 7ansible-0:2.9.7-1.el7aeRHSA-2020:1542
Red Hat Ansible Tower 3.4 for RHEL 7ansible-tower-34/ansible-tower-memcached:1.4.15-28RHBA-2020:0547
Red Hat Ansible Tower 3.5 for RHEL 7ansible-tower-35/ansible-tower:3.5.6-1RHBA-2020:1539

Frequently Asked Questions

A flaw was found in the Ansible Engine when the fetch module is used. An attacker could intercept the module, inject a new path, and then choose a new destination path on the controller node. All versions in 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x branches are believed to be vulnerable.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gfr2-qpxh-qj9m in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Path Traversal in Ansible (Medium 4.6)