Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 @frangoteam/fuxa

HIGH

GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in @frangoteam/fuxa. A fix is available for @frangoteam/fuxa — see the affected versions and patch details below.

FUXA has a hardcoded fallback JWT signing secret

Also known asCVE-2025-69971
Published
Mar 7, 2026
Updated
May 11, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
2.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs80th percentile — riskier than 80% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@frangoteam/fuxanpm
823downloads / week

Description

FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (frangoteam751) when no secretCode was configured.

If authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication.

This issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no secretCode is provided.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@frangoteam/fuxaall versions1.3.0npm install @frangoteam/fuxa@1.3.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @frangoteam/fuxa, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @frangoteam/fuxa to 1.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

How to detect GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5

A community-maintained Nuclei template exists for this CVE. You can scan for it directly:

nuclei -id ghsa-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 -u https://target
Template
FUXA <= 1.2.7 - Hardcoded JWT Secret Authentication Bypass
Severity
critical
Impact
Remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain full administrative access.
Remediation
Update to the latest version that removes hard-coded credentials.

Template by ProjectDiscovery nuclei-templates (trader642), MIT licensed. View the full template. Scan only systems you are authorised to test.

Frequently Asked Questions

FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (`frangoteam751`) when no `secretCode` was configured. If authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication. This issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no `secretCode` is provided.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5: @frangoteam/fuxa | O3 Security