Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2025-69971 — @frangoteam/fuxa

CRITICAL

CVE-2025-69971 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in @frangoteam/fuxa. A fix is available for @frangoteam/fuxa — see the affected versions and patch details below.

FUXA has a hardcoded fallback JWT signing secret

Also known asGHSA-c8m8-3jcr-6rj5
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 15, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-69971.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
2.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.14%
Lower risk than most CVEs82th percentile — riskier than 82% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.91%2.91%4.91%6.91%5.8%2.2%Apr 26Aug 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2025-69971 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 388,997 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@frangoteam/fuxanpm
2Kdownloads / week

Description

FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (frangoteam751) when no secretCode was configured.

If authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication.

This issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no secretCode is provided.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@frangoteam/fuxaall versions1.3.0npm install @frangoteam/fuxa@1.3.0

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
fuxafrangoteam
1 version
1.2.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @frangoteam/fuxa, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @frangoteam/fuxa to 1.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-69971 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

How to detect CVE-2025-69971

A community-maintained Nuclei template exists for this CVE. You can scan for it directly:

nuclei -id cve-2025-69971 -u https://target
Template
FUXA <= 1.2.7 - Hardcoded JWT Secret Authentication Bypass
Severity
critical
Impact
Remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain full administrative access.
Remediation
Update to the latest version that removes hard-coded credentials.

Template by ProjectDiscovery nuclei-templates (trader642), MIT licensed. View the full template. Scan only systems you are authorised to test.

Frequently Asked Questions

FUXA used a static fallback JWT signing secret (`frangoteam751`) when no `secretCode` was configured. If authentication was enabled without explicitly setting a custom secret, an attacker who knew the default value could forge valid JWT tokens and bypass authentication. This issue has been addressed in version 1.3.0 by removing the static fallback and generating a secure random secret when no `secretCode` is provided.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-69971 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-69971: @frangoteam/fuxa — Fixed in 1.3.0