How severe is CVE-2026-68519?

No CVSS score has been assigned to CVE-2026-68519 yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-68519?

CVE-2026-68519 affects the following packages: glances (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix CVE-2026-68519?

Update glances to 4.5.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-68519 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect CVE-2026-68519 in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate CVE-2026-68519 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Is CVE-2026-68519 actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for CVE-2026-68519 yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for CVE-2026-68519?

CVE-2026-68519 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.2%, placing it in the 7th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is CVE-2026-68519?

CVE-2026-68519 is classified as OS Command Injection (CWE-78). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure.

When was CVE-2026-68519 published, and has it been updated?

CVE-2026-68519 was published on August 17, 2026 and was last updated on September 20, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-68519 — glances

Fix: nicolargo/glances@5c07c0d

CVE-2026-68519 is a OS Command Injection vulnerability in glances. A fix is available for glances — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Glances: `--disable-config-exec` does not cover on-alert action commands (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-53925)

Also known asGHSA-59fj-m2j6-hcxhPYSEC-2026-3665

Published

Aug 17, 2026

Updated

Sep 20, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Oct 1, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-68519.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk+0.05%

Lower risk than most CVEs7th percentile — riskier than 7% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍glances

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

In Glances 4.5.5 the --disable-config-exec flag was extended (GHSA-3vwc-qwhc-3mj7) to stop secure_popen() from interpreting the shell operators &&, | and > in AMP command values taken from the configuration file. The hardening was not applied to the on-alert action command path, which reads its command lines from the same configuration file. As a result, with --disable-config-exec enabled, a configured alert action that contains > (file redirection), && (chaining) or | (pipe) still has those operators interpreted, allowing arbitrary file write / command chaining at the privilege of the glances process when the alert triggers.

Affected code

glances/actions.py (Glances 4.5.5, latest):

ret = secure_popen(cmd_full)        # line 111 — no allow_operators=, defaults to True

By contrast the AMP modules were fixed:

# glances/amps/default/__init__.py:69
self.set_result(secure_popen(res, allow_operators=self.allow_operators()).rstrip())
# glances/amps/systemv/__init__.py:60
res = secure_popen(self.get('service_cmd'), allow_operators=self.allow_operators())

PoC (benign)

glances.conf:

[cpu]
user_critical=1
user_critical_action=echo MARKER > /tmp/poc_marker

Run glances --disable-config-exec and generate CPU load. When the cpu user alert reaches CRITICAL, /tmp/poc_marker is created — i.e. the > operator was interpreted despite --disable-config-exec. The same > in an [amp_*] command value is correctly not interpreted.

Impact

Arbitrary file write (>), command chaining (&&) and pipe (|) from config-defined alert actions, contrary to the guarantee of --disable-config-exec. Trust boundary = the glances configuration file.

Suggested fix

Pass allow_operators=not args.disable_config_exec from GlancesActions.run() into secure_popen() (GlancesActions already holds args).

Credit

Reported via responsible-disclosure incomplete-fix measurement study.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`glances`	all versions	4.5.6`pip install --upgrade 'glances==4.5.6'`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update glances to 4.5.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-68519 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary In Glances 4.5.5 the `--disable-config-exec` flag was extended (GHSA-3vwc-qwhc-3mj7) to stop `secure_popen()` from interpreting the shell operators `&&`, `|` and `>` in **AMP** command values taken from the configuration file. The hardening was not applied to the **on-alert action** command path, which reads its command lines from the same configuration file. As a result, with `--disable-config-exec` enabled, a configured alert action that contains `>` (file redirection), `&&` (chaining) or `|` (pipe) still has those operators interpreted, allowing arbitrary file write / command cha

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-68519 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works