Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh

HIGHFix: nanopb/nanopb@4fe2359

GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in nanopb. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Memory leak in Nanopb

Also known asCVE-2020-26243PYSEC-2026-684
Published
Nov 25, 2020
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍nanopb🐍nanopb

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded contains the submessage multiple times. This is rare in normal messages, but it is a concern when untrusted data is parsed.

Patches

Preliminary patch is available on git and problem will be patched in versions 0.3.9.7 and 0.4.4 once testing has been completed.

Workarounds

Following workarounds are available:

  • Set the option no_unions for the oneof field. This will generate fields as separate instead of C union, and avoids triggering the problematic code.
  • Set the type of the submessage field inside oneof to FT_POINTER. This way the whole submessage will be dynamically allocated and the problematic code is not executed.
  • Use an arena allocator for nanopb, to make sure all memory can be released afterwards.

References

Bug report: https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb/issues/615

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, comment on the bug report linked above.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPInanopb0.3.2&&< 0.3.9.70.3.9.7
🐍PyPInanopb0.4.0&&< 0.4.40.4.4
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nanopb. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update nanopb to 0.3.9.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Decoding specifically formed message can leak memory if dynamic allocation is enabled and an oneof field contains a static submessage that contains a dynamic field, and the message being decoded contains the submessage multiple times. This is rare in normal messages, but it is a concern when untrusted data is parsed. ### Patches Preliminary patch is [available on git](https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb/commit/edf6dcbffee4d614ac0c2c1b258ab95185bdb6e9) and problem will be patched in versions 0.3.9.7 and 0.4.4 once testing has been completed. ### Workarounds Following workarounds are a
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-85rr-4rh9-hhwh across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.