Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-53723 — guzzle-services

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-53723 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in guzzlehttp/guzzle-services. A fix is available for guzzlehttp/guzzle-services — see the affected versions and patch details below.

guzzlehttp/guzzle-services' XML Request Serialization Vulnerable to XML Injection via CDATA Terminator

Also known asGHSA-q8r6-5hfw-5jff
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-53723.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs27th percentile — riskier than 27% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.28%0.56%0.85%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.3%0.3%Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-53723 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘guzzlehttp/guzzle-services

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

guzzlehttp/guzzle-services does not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator ]]>. The XML request serializer writes values containing <, >, or & with XMLWriter::writeCData($value). If attacker-controlled input contains ]]>, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema.

Users are affected when all of the following are true:

  1. The application uses guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to serialize outgoing requests.
  2. A request parameter or additionalParameters schema uses location: xml.
  3. The value is serialized as XML element text, not an XML attribute.
  4. The value can contain attacker-controlled, user-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted input.
  5. The value is not constrained by a safe enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>.
  6. The downstream service parses the generated XML structurally and may act on unexpected, duplicated, or injected elements.

Applications that serialize untrusted input into location: xml request parameters can emit XML containing attacker-controlled elements outside the intended text node. Depending on the receiving service, this can alter operation semantics, smuggle privileged fields, bypass modeled parameter boundaries, or create conflicting duplicated elements. Fixed service descriptions are sufficient if they contain an XML element parameter populated from attacker-controlled input.

Users are not directly affected if they only use Guzzle Services to deserialize HTTP response bodies. Response XML parsing uses the response XML location visitor and does not invoke the vulnerable request XML serializer. Response bodies matter only in a second-order flow, such as parsing attacker-controlled response XML, storing or forwarding a parsed string value, and later using it as a location: xml request parameter.

Example fixed service description:

'DisplayName' => ['location' => 'xml', 'type' => 'string']

If an attacker-controlled display name is:

Alice]]></DisplayName><Role>admin</Role><DisplayName><![CDATA[

the vulnerable serializer can emit an injected element outside the intended DisplayName text node:

<Request><DisplayName><![CDATA[Alice]]></DisplayName><Role>admin</Role><DisplayName><![CDATA[]]></DisplayName></Request>

If the downstream service treats <Role> as meaningful, the attacker has set a field the modeled DisplayName parameter was not intended to set.

Patches

The issue is patched in 1.5.4 and later by safely splitting embedded CDATA terminators before serialization. The fix preserves the original scalar value as XML text and prevents injected nodes.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, constrain attacker-controlled XML element values with a strict enum, pattern, or custom filter that excludes ]]>, or avoid serializing untrusted data into location: xml element text until patched. Where appropriate for the service schema, XML attributes are not affected because they are written with XMLWriter attribute APIs rather than CDATA sections.

To determine whether action is needed, search service descriptions for request parameters using location: xml, including operation parameters and additionalParameters. Response-only models are not directly affected unless parsed values are reused for request serialization. For object and array parameters, review nested scalar properties because leaf element values can still be affected.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle-servicesall versions1.5.4composer require guzzlehttp/guzzle-services:^1.5.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for guzzlehttp/guzzle-services, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update guzzlehttp/guzzle-services to 1.5.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-53723 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact `guzzlehttp/guzzle-services` does not safely serialize scalar XML element values containing the CDATA terminator `]]>`. The XML request serializer writes values containing `<`, `>`, or `&` with `XMLWriter::writeCData($value)`. If attacker-controlled input contains `]]>`, the CDATA section closes early and the remainder is interpreted as XML markup. This is an outgoing request-body integrity issue, not a response parsing issue. The attacker does not need to control the service description or schema. Users are affected when all of the following are true: 1. The application uses `gu
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-53723 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-53723: guzzle-services — Fixed in 1.5.4