Nodemailer: A nested comment ends early in addressparser, releasing the rest of the comment as a recipientGHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8
MEDIUMFix: nodemailer/nodemailer@0a87617GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in nodemailer. A fix is available for nodemailer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
nodemailernpmDescription
Vulnerability summary
RFC 5322 comments nest. addressparser ended a comment at the first ), including the one that closes a nested comment, and parsed the rest of the outer comment as header text. Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]> names [email protected] with x(y) <[email protected]> as a comment, and Nodemailer read it as the address [email protected]. This is the same shape as the escaped parenthesis fixed in 10.1.2, reached through nesting instead of a quoted-pair. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of an address that an application passes to Nodemailer, or the From or To header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.
Realistic exploitation scenario
An application validates a submitted address with a conformant parser and allows only its own domain. The attacker submits Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>, which validates as [email protected]. Nodemailer delivers to [email protected]. In the inbound direction, a DMARC or display layer built on a conformant parser and a mail client built on mailparser disagree on the author of the same message, which is the setting for sender spoofing. The boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list, or the author check of the receiving side.
Proof of concept
const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>"));
// [ { address: '[email protected]', name: 'Victim) [email protected]' } ]
Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as [email protected] with the display name Victim, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "Victim (x(y) <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Security impact
Mail intended for an approved recipient is delivered to an attacker chosen domain, disclosing its content, and parsers built on this module report a different author than conformant ones. The misreading only occurs on values a conformant validator approves, so correct validation is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix counts comment depth and ends a comment only at the ) that closes the outermost one.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | nodemailer | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 10.1.4 | 10.1.4npm install nodemailer@10.1.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nodemailer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nodemailer to 10.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.