Nodemailer: A ";" inside a quoted string or comment ends an address group early in addressparser, turning display text into a recipientGHSA-m943-m63m-w62w
MEDIUMFix: nodemailer/nodemailer@1cd57d2GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in nodemailer. A fix is available for nodemailer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
nodemailernpmDescription
Vulnerability summary
addressparser ends an RFC 5322 group at the first ;, including one inside a quoted display name or a comment. The text after it is parsed again as top level recipients with the quoting flipped, so text that every conformant parser reads as a display name or comment becomes a live address. G: (a; <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>; names only [email protected], and Nodemailer read it as the single recipient [email protected]. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of an address field that an application passes to Nodemailer, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 group that conformant parsers accept without defects.
Realistic exploitation scenario
An application validates the recipients of a submitted address list with a conformant parser and only allows addresses at its own domain. The attacker submits G: (a; <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>;. The validator sees one mailbox, [email protected], and approves it. Nodemailer delivers to [email protected] only. The same works through a quoted display name, G: "a;" "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>;. The boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list.
Proof of concept
const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("G: (a; <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>;"));
// [ { name: 'G', group: [ [Object] ] }, { address: '[email protected]', name: ') [email protected]' } ]
Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as the single mailbox [email protected], with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "G: (a; <[email protected]>) <[email protected]>;" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Security impact
Mail that an application intends for an approved recipient goes to a recipient chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content, and the intended recipient never receives it. The misreading only occurs on values a conformant validator approves, so correct validation is bypassed, which makes it a security issue rather than a parsing bug. Affected are applications that pass user influenced address lists to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix tracks quoted strings and comments inside a group and reads only a ; outside them.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | nodemailer | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 10.1.4 | 10.1.4npm install nodemailer@10.1.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nodemailer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nodemailer to 10.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.