CVE-2026-40594 — pyload-ng
MEDIUMCVE-2026-40594 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-346 vulnerability in pyload-ng. A fix is available for pyload-ng — see the affected versions and patch details below.
pyLoad has a Session Cookie Security Downgrade via Untrusted X-Forwarded-Proto Header Spoofing (Global State Race Condition)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-40594.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-40594 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
pyload-ngReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The set_session_cookie_secure before_request handler in src/pyload/webui/app/__init__.py reads the X-Forwarded-Proto header from any HTTP request without validating that the request originates from a trusted proxy, then mutates the global Flask configuration SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE on every request. Because pyLoad uses the multi-threaded Cheroot WSGI server (request_queue_size=512), this creates a race condition where an attacker's request can influence the Secure flag on other users' session cookies — either downgrading cookie security behind a TLS proxy or causing a session denial-of-service on plain HTTP deployments.
Details
The vulnerable code is in src/pyload/webui/app/__init__.py:75-84:
# Dynamically set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE according to the value of X-Forwarded-Proto
# TODO: Add trusted proxy check
@app.before_request
def set_session_cookie_secure():
x_forwarded_proto = flask.request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-Proto", "")
is_secure = (
x_forwarded_proto.split(',')[0].strip() == "https" or
app.config["PYLOAD_API"].get_config_value("webui", "use_ssl")
)
flask.current_app.config['SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE'] = is_secure
The root cause has two components:
-
No origin validation (CWE-346): The
X-Forwarded-Protoheader is read from any client request. This header is only trustworthy when set by a known reverse proxy. WithoutProxyFixmiddleware or a trusted proxy allowlist, any client can spoof it. The code itself acknowledges this with the TODO on line 76. -
Global state mutation in a multi-threaded server:
flask.current_app.config['SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE']is application-wide shared state. When Thread A (attacker) writesFalseto this config, Thread B (victim) may readFalsewhen Flask'ssave_session()runs in the after_request phase, producing aSet-Cookieresponse without theSecureflag.
The Cheroot WSGI server is configured with request_queue_size=512 in src/pyload/webui/webserver_thread.py:46, confirming concurrent multi-threaded request processing.
No ProxyFix or equivalent middleware is configured anywhere in the codebase (confirmed via codebase-wide search).
PoC
Attack Path 1 — Cookie Security Downgrade (behind TLS-terminating proxy, use_ssl=False):
An attacker with direct access to the backend (e.g., in a containerized/Kubernetes deployment) sends concurrent requests to keep SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE set to False:
# Attacker floods backend directly, bypassing TLS proxy
for i in $(seq 1 200); do
curl -s -H 'X-Forwarded-Proto: http' http://pyload-backend:8000/ &
done
# Meanwhile, a legitimate user behind the TLS proxy receives a session cookie
# During the race window, their Set-Cookie header lacks the Secure flag
# The cookie is then vulnerable to interception over plain HTTP
Attack Path 2 — Session Denial of Service (default plain HTTP deployment):
# Attacker causes SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE=True on a plain HTTP server
for i in $(seq 1 200); do
curl -s -H 'X-Forwarded-Proto: https' http://localhost:8000/ &
done
# Concurrent legitimate users receive Set-Cookie with Secure flag
# Browser refuses to send Secure cookies over HTTP
# Users' sessions silently break — they appear logged out
The second attack path works against the default configuration (use_ssl=False) and requires no special network position.
Impact
-
Session cookie exposure (Attack Path 1): When deployed behind a TLS-terminating proxy, an attacker can cause session cookies to be issued without the
Secureflag. If the victim's browser subsequently makes an HTTP request (e.g., via a mixed-content link or downgrade attack), the session cookie is transmitted in cleartext, enabling session hijacking. -
Session denial of service (Attack Path 2): On default plain HTTP deployments, an attacker can continuously set
SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE=True, causing browsers to refuse sending session cookies back to the server. This silently breaks all concurrent users' sessions with no user-visible error message, only a redirect to login. -
No authentication required: Both attack paths are fully unauthenticated — the
before_requesthandler fires before any auth checks.
Recommended Fix
Replace the global config mutation with per-response cookie handling, and add proxy validation:
# Option A: Set Secure flag per-response instead of mutating global config
@app.after_request
def set_session_cookie_secure(response):
# Only trust X-Forwarded-Proto if ProxyFix is configured
is_secure = app.config["PYLOAD_API"].get_config_value("webui", "use_ssl")
if 'Set-Cookie' in response.headers:
# Modify cookie flags per-response, not global config
cookies = response.headers.getlist('Set-Cookie')
response.headers.remove('Set-Cookie')
for cookie in cookies:
if is_secure and 'Secure' not in cookie:
cookie += '; Secure'
response.headers.add('Set-Cookie', cookie)
return response
# Option B (preferred): Use Werkzeug's ProxyFix with explicit trust
from werkzeug.middleware.proxy_fix import ProxyFix
# In App.__new__, before returning:
if trusted_proxy_count: # from config
app.wsgi_app = ProxyFix(app.wsgi_app, x_proto=trusted_proxy_count)
# Then set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE once at startup based on use_ssl config,
# and let ProxyFix handle X-Forwarded-Proto transparently
At minimum, remove the before_request handler entirely and set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE once at startup (line 130 already does this in _configure_session). The dynamic per-request adjustment is the root cause of both the spoofing and the race condition.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pyload-ng | all versions | 0.5.0b3.dev98pip install --upgrade 'pyload-ng==0.5.0b3.dev98' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyload-ng, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev98 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-40594 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-40594 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-40594. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-40594 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-40594 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.