Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-40594 pyload-ng

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-40594 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-346 vulnerability in pyload-ng. A fix is available for pyload-ng — see the affected versions and patch details below.

pyLoad has a Session Cookie Security Downgrade via Untrusted X-Forwarded-Proto Header Spoofing (Global State Race Condition)

Also known asPYSEC-2026-125
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Updated
Jun 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-40594.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs7th percentile — riskier than 7% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-40594 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍pyload-ng

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The set_session_cookie_secure before_request handler in src/pyload/webui/app/__init__.py reads the X-Forwarded-Proto header from any HTTP request without validating that the request originates from a trusted proxy, then mutates the global Flask configuration SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE on every request. Because pyLoad uses the multi-threaded Cheroot WSGI server (request_queue_size=512), this creates a race condition where an attacker's request can influence the Secure flag on other users' session cookies — either downgrading cookie security behind a TLS proxy or causing a session denial-of-service on plain HTTP deployments.

Details

The vulnerable code is in src/pyload/webui/app/__init__.py:75-84:

# Dynamically set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE according to the value of X-Forwarded-Proto
# TODO: Add trusted proxy check
@app.before_request
def set_session_cookie_secure():
    x_forwarded_proto = flask.request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-Proto", "")
    is_secure = (
        x_forwarded_proto.split(',')[0].strip() == "https" or
        app.config["PYLOAD_API"].get_config_value("webui", "use_ssl")
    )
    flask.current_app.config['SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE'] = is_secure

The root cause has two components:

  1. No origin validation (CWE-346): The X-Forwarded-Proto header is read from any client request. This header is only trustworthy when set by a known reverse proxy. Without ProxyFix middleware or a trusted proxy allowlist, any client can spoof it. The code itself acknowledges this with the TODO on line 76.

  2. Global state mutation in a multi-threaded server: flask.current_app.config['SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE'] is application-wide shared state. When Thread A (attacker) writes False to this config, Thread B (victim) may read False when Flask's save_session() runs in the after_request phase, producing a Set-Cookie response without the Secure flag.

The Cheroot WSGI server is configured with request_queue_size=512 in src/pyload/webui/webserver_thread.py:46, confirming concurrent multi-threaded request processing.

No ProxyFix or equivalent middleware is configured anywhere in the codebase (confirmed via codebase-wide search).

PoC

Attack Path 1 — Cookie Security Downgrade (behind TLS-terminating proxy, use_ssl=False):

An attacker with direct access to the backend (e.g., in a containerized/Kubernetes deployment) sends concurrent requests to keep SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE set to False:

# Attacker floods backend directly, bypassing TLS proxy
for i in $(seq 1 200); do
  curl -s -H 'X-Forwarded-Proto: http' http://pyload-backend:8000/ &
done

# Meanwhile, a legitimate user behind the TLS proxy receives a session cookie
# During the race window, their Set-Cookie header lacks the Secure flag
# The cookie is then vulnerable to interception over plain HTTP

Attack Path 2 — Session Denial of Service (default plain HTTP deployment):

# Attacker causes SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE=True on a plain HTTP server
for i in $(seq 1 200); do
  curl -s -H 'X-Forwarded-Proto: https' http://localhost:8000/ &
done

# Concurrent legitimate users receive Set-Cookie with Secure flag
# Browser refuses to send Secure cookies over HTTP
# Users' sessions silently break — they appear logged out

The second attack path works against the default configuration (use_ssl=False) and requires no special network position.

Impact

  • Session cookie exposure (Attack Path 1): When deployed behind a TLS-terminating proxy, an attacker can cause session cookies to be issued without the Secure flag. If the victim's browser subsequently makes an HTTP request (e.g., via a mixed-content link or downgrade attack), the session cookie is transmitted in cleartext, enabling session hijacking.

  • Session denial of service (Attack Path 2): On default plain HTTP deployments, an attacker can continuously set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE=True, causing browsers to refuse sending session cookies back to the server. This silently breaks all concurrent users' sessions with no user-visible error message, only a redirect to login.

  • No authentication required: Both attack paths are fully unauthenticated — the before_request handler fires before any auth checks.

Recommended Fix

Replace the global config mutation with per-response cookie handling, and add proxy validation:

# Option A: Set Secure flag per-response instead of mutating global config
@app.after_request
def set_session_cookie_secure(response):
    # Only trust X-Forwarded-Proto if ProxyFix is configured
    is_secure = app.config["PYLOAD_API"].get_config_value("webui", "use_ssl")
    if 'Set-Cookie' in response.headers:
        # Modify cookie flags per-response, not global config
        cookies = response.headers.getlist('Set-Cookie')
        response.headers.remove('Set-Cookie')
        for cookie in cookies:
            if is_secure and 'Secure' not in cookie:
                cookie += '; Secure'
            response.headers.add('Set-Cookie', cookie)
    return response

# Option B (preferred): Use Werkzeug's ProxyFix with explicit trust
from werkzeug.middleware.proxy_fix import ProxyFix

# In App.__new__, before returning:
if trusted_proxy_count:  # from config
    app.wsgi_app = ProxyFix(app.wsgi_app, x_proto=trusted_proxy_count)
# Then set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE once at startup based on use_ssl config,
# and let ProxyFix handle X-Forwarded-Proto transparently

At minimum, remove the before_request handler entirely and set SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE once at startup (line 130 already does this in _configure_session). The dynamic per-request adjustment is the root cause of both the spoofing and the race condition.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpyload-ngall versions0.5.0b3.dev98pip install --upgrade 'pyload-ng==0.5.0b3.dev98'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyload-ng, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev98 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-40594 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-40594 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-40594. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `set_session_cookie_secure` `before_request` handler in `src/pyload/webui/app/__init__.py` reads the `X-Forwarded-Proto` header from any HTTP request without validating that the request originates from a trusted proxy, then mutates the **global** Flask configuration `SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE` on every request. Because pyLoad uses the multi-threaded Cheroot WSGI server (`request_queue_size=512`), this creates a race condition where an attacker's request can influence the `Secure` flag on other users' session cookies — either downgrading cookie security behind a TLS proxy or causing
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-40594 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-40594 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-40594: pyload-ng DoS (Medium 4.8) | O3 Security