Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

CVE-2024-24560 vyper

LOW

CVE-2024-24560 is a low-severity (CVSS 3.7) Buffer Overflow vulnerability in vyper. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Vyper external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer

Also known asGHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686PYSEC-2024-148
Published
Feb 2, 2024
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2024-24560.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2024-24560 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

When calls to external contracts are made, we write the input buffer starting at byte 28, and allocate the return buffer to start at byte 0 (overlapping with the input buffer). When checking RETURNDATASIZE for dynamic types, the size is compared only to the minimum allowed size for that type, and not to the returned value's length. As a result, malformed return data can cause the contract to mistake data from the input buffer for returndata.

This advisory is given a severity of "Low" because when the called contract returns invalid ABIv2 encoded data, the calling contract can read different invalid data (from the dirty buffer) than the called contract returned.

Details

When arguments are packed for an external call, we create a buffer of size max(args, return_data) + 32. The input buffer is placed in this buffer (starting at byte 28), and the return buffer is allocated to start at byte 0. The assumption is that we can reuse the memory becase we will not be able to read past RETURNDATASIZE.

if fn_type.return_type is not None:
    return_abi_t = calculate_type_for_external_return(fn_type.return_type).abi_type

    # we use the same buffer for args and returndata,
    # so allocate enough space here for the returndata too.
    buflen = max(args_abi_t.size_bound(), return_abi_t.size_bound())
else:
    buflen = args_abi_t.size_bound()

buflen += 32  # padding for the method id

When data is returned, we unpack the return data by starting at byte 0. We check that RETURNDATASIZE is greater than the minimum allowed for the returned type:

if not call_kwargs.skip_contract_check:
    assertion = IRnode.from_list(
        ["assert", ["ge", "returndatasize", min_return_size]],
        error_msg="returndatasize too small",
    )
    unpacker.append(assertion)

This check ensures that any dynamic types returned will have a size of at least 64. However, it does not verify that RETURNDATASIZE is as large as the length word of the dynamic type.

As a result, if a contract expects a dynamic type to be returned, and the part of the return data that is read as length includes a size that is larger than the actual RETURNDATASIZE, the return data read from the buffer will overrun the actual return data size and read from the input buffer.

Proof of Concept

This contract calls an external contract with two arguments. As the call is made, the buffer includes:

  • byte 28: method_id
  • byte 32: first argument (0)
  • byte 64: second argument (hash)

The return data buffer begins at byte 0, and will return the returned bytestring, up to a maximum length of 96 bytes.

interface Zero:
    def sneaky(a: uint256, b: bytes32) -> Bytes[96]: view

@external
def test_sneaky(z: address) -> Bytes[96]:
    return Zero(z).sneaky(0, keccak256("oops"))

On the other side, imagine a simple contract that does not, in fact, return a bytestring, but instead returns two uint256s. I've implemented it in Solidity for ease of use with Foundry:

function sneaky(uint a, bytes32 b) external pure returns (uint, uint) {
    return (32, 32);
}

The return data will be parsed as a bytestring. The first 32 will point us to byte 32 to read the length. The second 32 will be perceived as the length. It will then read the next 32 bytes from the return data buffer, even though those weren't a part of the return data.

Since these bytes will come from byte 64, we can see above that the hash was placed there in the input buffer.

If we run the following Foundry test, we can see that this does in fact happen:

function test__sneakyZeroReturn() public {
    ZeroReturn z = new ZeroReturn();
    c = SuperContract(deployer.deploy("src/loose/", "ret_overflow", ""));
    console.logBytes(c.test_sneaky(address(z)));
}
Logs:
  0xd54c03ccbc84dd6002c98c6df5a828e42272fc54b512ca20694392ca89c4d2c6

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3925, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4091, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4144, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4060.

Impact

Malicious or mistaken contracts returning the malformed data can result in overrunning the returned data and reading return data from the input buffer.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.4.0pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.4.0'
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2024-24560 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2024-24560 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2024-24560. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary When calls to external contracts are made, we write the input buffer starting at byte 28, and allocate the return buffer to start at byte 0 (overlapping with the input buffer). When checking `RETURNDATASIZE` for dynamic types, the size is compared only to the minimum allowed size for that type, and not to the returned value's `length`. As a result, malformed return data can cause the contract to mistake data from the input buffer for returndata. This advisory is given a severity of "Low" because when the called contract returns invalid ABIv2 encoded data, the calling contract can
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2024-24560 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2024-24560 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2024-24560: vyper (Low 3.7) | O3 Security