Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-27105 — vyper

CVE-2025-27105 is a Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in vyper. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

AugAssign evaluation order causing OOB write within the object in Vyper

Also known asGHSA-4w26-8p97-f4jpPYSEC-2025-31
Published
Feb 21, 2025
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-27105.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs45th percentile — riskier than 45% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Vyper handles AugAssign statements by first caching the target location to avoid double evaluation. However, in the case when target is an access to a DynArray and the rhs modifies the array, the cached target will evaluate first, and the bounds check will not be re-evaluated during the write portion of the statement. In other words, the following code

def poc():
    a: DynArray[uint256, 2] = [1, 2]
    a[1] += a.pop()

is equivalent to:

def poc():
    a: DynArray[uint256, 2] = [1, 2]
    a[1] += a[len(a) - 1]
    a.pop()

rather than:

def poc():
    a: DynArray[uint256, 2] = [1, 2]
    s: uint256 = a[1]
    t: uint256 = a.pop()
    a[1] = s + t  # reverts due to oob access

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.4.1pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.4.1'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.4.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-27105 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2025-27105 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2025-27105. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Vyper handles AugAssign statements by first caching the target location to avoid double evaluation. However, in the case when target is an access to a DynArray and the rhs modifies the array, the cached target will evaluate first, and the bounds check will not be re-evaluated during the write portion of the statement. In other words, the following code ```vyper def poc(): a: DynArray[uint256, 2] = [1, 2] a[1] += a.pop() ``` is equivalent to: ```vyper def poc(): a: DynArray[uint256, 2] = [1, 2] a[1] += a[len(a) - 1] a.pop() ``` rather than: ```vyper def poc(): a: DynAr
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-27105 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2025-27105 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2025-27105: vyper | O3 Security