CVE-2025-47774 — vyper
Fix: vyperlang/vyper#4645CVE-2025-47774 is a CWE-691 vulnerability in vyper. The records list no fixed version yet; check the vendor advisory below and apply the mitigations in the meantime.
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-47774.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
vyperReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
Patches
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vyper | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
The records we use list no patched version of vyper for CVE-2025-47774. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2025-47774 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.