GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686
LOWVyper's external calls can overflow return data to return input buffer
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
vyperReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
When calls to external contracts are made, we write the input buffer starting at byte 28, and allocate the return buffer to start at byte 0 (overlapping with the input buffer). When checking RETURNDATASIZE for dynamic types, the size is compared only to the minimum allowed size for that type, and not to the returned value's length. As a result, malformed return data can cause the contract to mistake data from the input buffer for returndata.
This advisory is given a severity of "Low" because when the called contract returns invalid ABIv2 encoded data, the calling contract can read different invalid data (from the dirty buffer) than the called contract returned.
Details
When arguments are packed for an external call, we create a buffer of size max(args, return_data) + 32. The input buffer is placed in this buffer (starting at byte 28), and the return buffer is allocated to start at byte 0. The assumption is that we can reuse the memory becase we will not be able to read past RETURNDATASIZE.
if fn_type.return_type is not None:
return_abi_t = calculate_type_for_external_return(fn_type.return_type).abi_type
# we use the same buffer for args and returndata,
# so allocate enough space here for the returndata too.
buflen = max(args_abi_t.size_bound(), return_abi_t.size_bound())
else:
buflen = args_abi_t.size_bound()
buflen += 32 # padding for the method id
When data is returned, we unpack the return data by starting at byte 0. We check that RETURNDATASIZE is greater than the minimum allowed for the returned type:
if not call_kwargs.skip_contract_check:
assertion = IRnode.from_list(
["assert", ["ge", "returndatasize", min_return_size]],
error_msg="returndatasize too small",
)
unpacker.append(assertion)
This check ensures that any dynamic types returned will have a size of at least 64. However, it does not verify that RETURNDATASIZE is as large as the length word of the dynamic type.
As a result, if a contract expects a dynamic type to be returned, and the part of the return data that is read as length includes a size that is larger than the actual RETURNDATASIZE, the return data read from the buffer will overrun the actual return data size and read from the input buffer.
Proof of Concept
This contract calls an external contract with two arguments. As the call is made, the buffer includes:
- byte 28: method_id
- byte 32: first argument (0)
- byte 64: second argument (hash)
The return data buffer begins at byte 0, and will return the returned bytestring, up to a maximum length of 96 bytes.
interface Zero:
def sneaky(a: uint256, b: bytes32) -> Bytes[96]: view
@external
def test_sneaky(z: address) -> Bytes[96]:
return Zero(z).sneaky(0, keccak256("oops"))
On the other side, imagine a simple contract that does not, in fact, return a bytestring, but instead returns two uint256s. I've implemented it in Solidity for ease of use with Foundry:
function sneaky(uint a, bytes32 b) external pure returns (uint, uint) {
return (32, 32);
}
The return data will be parsed as a bytestring. The first 32 will point us to byte 32 to read the length. The second 32 will be perceived as the length. It will then read the next 32 bytes from the return data buffer, even though those weren't a part of the return data.
Since these bytes will come from byte 64, we can see above that the hash was placed there in the input buffer.
If we run the following Foundry test, we can see that this does in fact happen:
function test__sneakyZeroReturn() public {
ZeroReturn z = new ZeroReturn();
c = SuperContract(deployer.deploy("src/loose/", "ret_overflow", ""));
console.logBytes(c.test_sneaky(address(z)));
}
Logs:
0xd54c03ccbc84dd6002c98c6df5a828e42272fc54b512ca20694392ca89c4d2c6
Patches
Patched in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3925, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4091, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4144, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4060.
Impact
Malicious or mistaken contracts returning the malformed data can result in overrunning the returned data and reading return data from the input buffer.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vyper | all versions | 0.4.0 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update vyper to 0.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-gp3w-2v2m-p686 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.