NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2023-42441 — vyper

MEDIUMFix: vyperlang/vyper@0b74028

CVE-2023-42441 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-833 vulnerability in vyper. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Vyper has incorrect re-entrancy lock when key is empty string

Also known asGHSA-3hg2-r75x-g69mPYSEC-2023-305
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-42441.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs44th percentile — riskier than 44% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.34%0.68%1.01%0.2%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Locks of the type @nonreentrant("") or @nonreentrant('') do not produce reentrancy checks at runtime.

@nonreentrant("") # unprotected
@external
def bar():
    pass

@nonreentrant("lock") # protected
@external
def foo():
    pass

Patches

Patched in #3605

Workarounds

The lock name should be a non-empty string.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyper≥ 0.2.9&&< 0.3.100.3.10pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.3.10'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
vypervyperlang
≥ 0.2.9 && < 0.3.10
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.3.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-42441 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Locks of the type `@nonreentrant("")` or `@nonreentrant('')` do not produce reentrancy checks at runtime. ```Vyper @nonreentrant("") # unprotected @external def bar(): pass @nonreentrant("lock") # protected @external def foo(): pass ``` ### Patches Patched in #3605 ### Workarounds The lock name should be a non-empty string. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-42441 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-42441: vyper — Fixed in 0.3.10