NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2023-30837 — vyper

HIGHFix: vyperlang/vyper@0bb7203

CVE-2023-30837 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-789 vulnerability in vyper. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Vyper storage allocator overflow

Also known asGHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6PYSEC-2023-76
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 1, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2023-30837.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs53th percentile — riskier than 53% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.40%0.80%1.20%0.2%0.7%May 26Aug 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows. This can result in vulnerabilities like the following:

owner: public(address)
take_up_some_space: public(uint256[10])
buffer: public(uint256[max_value(uint256)])

@external
def initialize():
    self.owner = msg.sender

@external
def foo(idx: uint256, data: uint256):
    self.buffer[idx] = data

Per @toonvanhove, "An attacker can overwrite the owner variable by calling this contract with calldata: 0x04bc52f8 fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff (spaces inserted for readability) 0x04bc52f8 is the selector for foo(uint256, uint256), and the last argument fff...fff is the new value for the owner variable."

Patches

patched in 0bb7203b584e771b23536ba065a6efda457161bb

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.3.8pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.3.8'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
vypervyperlang
< 0.3.8
range
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.3.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2023-30837 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows. This can result in vulnerabilities like the following: ```vyper owner: public(address) take_up_some_space: public(uint256[10]) buffer: public(uint256[max_value(uint256)]) @external def initialize(): self.owner = msg.sender @external def foo(idx: uint256, data: uint256): self.buffer[idx] = data ``` Per @toonvanhove, "An attacker can overwrite the owner variable by calling this contract with calldata: `0x04bc52f8 fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2023-30837 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2023-30837: vyper — Fixed in 0.3.8