Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 vyper

HIGHFix: vyperlang/vyper@0bb7203

GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-789 vulnerability in vyper. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for vyper — see the affected versions and patch details below.

vyper vulnerable to storage allocator overflow

Also known asCVE-2023-30837PYSEC-2023-76
Published
May 5, 2023
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs52th percentile — riskier than 52% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍vyper

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows. This can result in vulnerabilities like the following:

owner: public(address)
take_up_some_space: public(uint256[10])
buffer: public(uint256[max_value(uint256)])

@external
def initialize():
    self.owner = msg.sender

@external
def foo(idx: uint256, data: uint256):
    self.buffer[idx] = data

Per @toonvanhove, "An attacker can overwrite the owner variable by calling this contract with calldata: 0x04bc52f8 fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff (spaces inserted for readability) 0x04bc52f8 is the selector for foo(uint256, uint256), and the last argument fff...fff is the new value for the owner variable."

Patches

patched in 0bb7203b584e771b23536ba065a6efda457161bb

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIvyperall versions0.3.8pip install --upgrade 'vyper==0.3.8'
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vyper, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vyper to 0.3.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The storage allocator does not guard against allocation overflows. This can result in vulnerabilities like the following: ```vyper owner: public(address) take_up_some_space: public(uint256[10]) buffer: public(uint256[max_value(uint256)]) @external def initialize(): self.owner = msg.sender @external def foo(idx: uint256, data: uint256): self.buffer[idx] = data ``` Per @toonvanhove, "An attacker can overwrite the owner variable by calling this contract with calldata: `0x04bc52f8 fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff5 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-mgv8-gggw-mrg6: vyper (High 7.5) | O3 Security