GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 — actionview
MEDIUMGHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in actionview. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for actionview — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CSRF Vulnerability in rails-ujs
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
actionview💎actionviewReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
There is a vulnerability in rails-ujs that allows attackers to send CSRF tokens to wrong domains.
Versions Affected: rails <= 6.0.3 Not affected: Applications which don't use rails-ujs. Fixed Versions: rails >= 5.2.4.3, rails >= 6.0.3.1
Impact
This is a regression of CVE-2015-1840.
In the scenario where an attacker might be able to control the href attribute of an anchor tag or the action attribute of a form tag that will trigger a POST action, the attacker can set the href or action to a cross-origin URL, and the CSRF token will be sent.
Workarounds
To work around this problem, change code that allows users to control the href attribute of an anchor tag or the action attribute of a form tag to filter the user parameters.
For example, code like this:
link_to params
to code like this:
link_to filtered_params
def filtered_params
# Filter just the parameters that you trust
end
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | actionview | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.2.4.3 | 5.2.4.3bundle update actionview --conservative |
| 💎RubyGems | actionview | ≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.0.3.1 | 6.0.3.1bundle update actionview --conservative |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for actionview, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update actionview to 5.2.4.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Satellite 6.9 for RHEL 7 | ansible-collection-redhat-satellite-0:2.0.1-1.el7sat | RHSA-2021:1313 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-xq5j-gw7f-jgj8 across RubyGems dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.