or or \n```\n\nor\n\n```erb\n\n```\n\n### Releases\n\nThe 6.0.2.2 and 5.2"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How severe is CVE-2020-5267?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CVE-2020-5267 has a CVSS score of 4.8/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which packages are affected by CVE-2020-5267?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CVE-2020-5267 affects the following packages: actionview (RubyGems), actionview (RubyGems). Ecosystems affected: RubyGems."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I fix CVE-2020-5267?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Update actionview to 5.2.4.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2020-5267 is resolved across your whole dependency graph."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I detect CVE-2020-5267 in my RubyGems dependencies?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for actionview, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I mitigate CVE-2020-5267 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is CVE-2020-5267 actively exploited in the wild?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes. There are 2 known exploit references for CVE-2020-5267, including 2 in-the-wild exploitations observed on GitHub and other sources. Treat this as actively exploitable and prioritize patching immediately. All exploit code should only be run in an isolated sandbox environment for research or authorized testing — never against production systems without explicit written authorization."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the EPSS score for CVE-2020-5267?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CVE-2020-5267 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.5%, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What type of vulnerability is CVE-2020-5267?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CVE-2020-5267 is classified as CWE-80 (CWE-80), Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79). These weakness types describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"When was CVE-2020-5267 published, and has it been updated?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"CVE-2020-5267 was published on March 19, 2020 and was last updated on October 20, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting."}}]}
NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎
💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2020-5267 — actionview

MEDIUMFix: rails/rails@033a738

CVE-2020-5267 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-80 vulnerability in actionview. 2 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for actionview — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Cross site scripting vulnerability in ActionView

Also known asGHSA-65cv-r6x7-79hv
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
2 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 5, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs75th percentile — riskier than 75% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.39%0.94%1.49%2.04%0.9%1.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎actionview💎actionview

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

There is a possible cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ActionView's JavaScript literal escape helpers. Views that use the j or escape_javascript methods may be susceptible to XSS attacks.

Impact

There is a possible XSS vulnerability in the j and escape_javascript methods in ActionView. These methods are used for escaping JavaScript string literals. Impacted code will look something like this:

<script>let a = `<%= j unknown_input %>`</script>

or

<script>let a = `<%= escape_javascript unknown_input %>`</script>

Releases

The 6.0.2.2 and 5.2.4.2 releases are available at the normal locations.

Workarounds

For those that can't upgrade, the following monkey patch may be used:

ActionView::Helpers::JavaScriptHelper::JS_ESCAPE_MAP.merge!(
  {
    "`" => "\\`",
    "$" => "\\$"
  }
)

module ActionView::Helpers::JavaScriptHelper
  alias :old_ej :escape_javascript
  alias :old_j :j

  def escape_javascript(javascript)
    javascript = javascript.to_s
    if javascript.empty?
      result = ""
    else
      result = javascript.gsub(/(\\|<\/|\r\n|\342\200\250|\342\200\251|[\n\r"']|[`]|[$])/u, JS_ESCAPE_MAP)
    end
    javascript.html_safe? ? result.html_safe : result
  end

  alias :j :escape_javascript
end

Patches

To aid users who aren't able to upgrade immediately we have provided patches for the two supported release series. They are in git-am format and consist of a single changeset.

Please note that only the 5.2 and 6.0 series are supported at present. Users of earlier unsupported releases are advised to upgrade as soon as possible as we cannot guarantee the continued availability of security fixes for unsupported releases.

Credits

Thanks to Jesse Campos from Chef Secure

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemsactionviewall versions5.2.4.2bundle update actionview --conservative
💎RubyGemsactionview≥ 6.0.0&&< 6.0.2.26.0.2.2bundle update actionview --conservative

Affected Products

4 products · 5 configurations
OS
debian linuxdebian
1 version
8.0
OS
fedorafedoraproject
1 version
33
OS
leapopensuse
1 version
15.1
Application
actionviewrubyonrails
≥ 6.0.0 && < 6.0.2.2
range
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for actionview, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update actionview to 5.2.4.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2020-5267 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

Red Hat CloudForms and Satellite ship affected RubyGem actionview with methods, however, those are not vulnerable since none of those uses template string enclosed with backtick characters. A future update may fix affected RubyGem.

ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Satellite 6.8 for RHEL 7ansible-collection-redhat-satellite-0:1.3.0-1.el7satRHSA-2020:4366

Frequently Asked Questions

There is a possible cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ActionView's JavaScript literal escape helpers. Views that use the `j` or `escape_javascript` methods may be susceptible to XSS attacks. ### Impact There is a possible XSS vulnerability in the `j` and `escape_javascript` methods in ActionView. These methods are used for escaping JavaScript string literals. Impacted code will look something like this: ```erb <script>let a = `<%= j unknown_input %>`</script> ``` or ```erb <script>let a = `<%= escape_javascript unknown_input %>`</script> ``` ### Releases The 6.0.2.2 and 5.2
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2020-5267 in your dependencies?

Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2020-5267: actionview XSS — Fixed in 5.2.4.2