GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3
MEDIUMGHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.3) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Gitea: SSRF in restore-repo via unsanitized pull_request.yml Head.CloneURL
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3.
Real-World Exposure
code.gitea.io/giteaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Gitea's restore-repo CLI command restores a repository from a dump
directory/archive. When parsing pull_request.yml from that dump, the
Head.CloneURL field is used to add a git remote and fetch from it with
no validation, because the safety check that's supposed to guard it
(CheckAndEnsureSafePR) is called with an empty commonCloneBaseURL,
which silently disables it. This lets a malicious dump make the Gitea
server execute git fetch against an attacker-chosen URL (SSRF), or
disclose a local git repository via file://. This is a different root
cause from the recently fixed path-traversal issue in the same command
(#38215), which patched DownloadURL/PatchURL but not Head.CloneURL.
Details
services/migrations/restore.go's GetPullRequests() unmarshals
pull_request.yml directly into base.PullRequest structs with no
validation of Head.CloneURL:
err = yaml.Unmarshal(bs, &pulls)
...
for _, pr := range pulls {
if pr.PatchURL != "" {
pr.PatchURL = "file://" + util.FilePathJoinAbs(r.baseDir, pr.PatchURL)
}
CheckAndEnsureSafePR(pr, "", r) // <-- empty baseURL
}
CheckAndEnsureSafePR (services/migrations/common.go) is supposed to
reject Head.CloneURL/PatchURL values that don't share a common base
URL:
func hasBaseURL(toCheck, baseURL string) bool {
if len(baseURL) > 0 && baseURL[len(baseURL)-1] != '/' {
baseURL += "/"
}
return strings.HasPrefix(toCheck, baseURL)
}
func CheckAndEnsureSafePR(pr *base.PullRequest, commonCloneBaseURL string, g base.Downloader) bool {
valid := true
if pr.PatchURL != "" && !hasBaseURL(pr.PatchURL, commonCloneBaseURL) {
pr.PatchURL = ""
valid = false
}
if pr.Head.CloneURL != "" && !hasBaseURL(pr.Head.CloneURL, commonCloneBaseURL) {
pr.Head.CloneURL = ""
valid = false
}
return valid
}
strings.HasPrefix(anything, "") is always true in Go. Because
restore.go is the only caller that passes "" as
commonCloneBaseURL, this check is a complete no-op on the restore-repo
path — Head.CloneURL survives unchanged regardless of its value. Every
other downloader (github.go, gitlab.go, gitea_downloader.go,
codebase.go, codecommit.go, onedev.go) passes a real base URL, so
they are not affected.
services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go then uses the unvalidated value
directly:
err := g.gitRepo.AddRemote(remote, pr.Head.CloneURL, true)
// ... later: fetch from that remote
resulting in the server executing git fetch against an
attacker-controlled URL sourced from the dump file.
RCE via git's ext:: transport helper was tested and ruled out — a
normal git install rejects it by default (fatal: transport 'ext' not allowed), independent of Gitea's own configuration. This report is
scoped to SSRF and local git-repository disclosure.
Confirmed present, byte-for-byte identical, in v1.26.4 (latest stable
tag), release/v1.27, and main, by direct checkout and diff.
PoC
- Create a dump directory following the normal
restore-repolayout (repo.yml, etc.), and add apull_request.ymlcontaining at least one entry with:
- number: 1
head:
cloneURL: "http://<attacker-controlled-or-internal-host>:<port>/ssrf-proof"
ref: "main"
- Run
gitea restore-repoagainst that dump directory for any repo owner. - Observe on the target host/listener: an actual
gitHTTP discovery request arrives, e.g.GET /ssrf-proof/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack, driven entirely by the value from the dump file.
Verified the core mechanism (steps 2–3, i.e. the unvalidated
Head.CloneURL surviving CheckAndEnsureSafePR("") and then being used
in a real git remote add + git fetch) with a minimal, standalone Go
program built from the verbatim, unmodified hasBaseURL /
CheckAndEnsureSafePR function bodies (attached: gitea_ssrf_poc.go),
run end-to-end against a local HTTP listener. The listener's access log
confirms the request actually arrives.
Impact
An attacker who can get an administrator to run gitea restore-repo
against a malicious dump (the same threat model already accepted for the
just-fixed path-traversal issue in this command, #38215) can make the
Gitea server issue a git fetch against an arbitrary attacker-chosen
URL. This allows:
- SSRF against internal-only services or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from the Gitea host.
- Disclosure of local git repositories reachable via
file://paths readable by the Gitea process.
No public disclosure planned. Happy to provide further detail on request.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.gitea.io/gitea | all versions | 1.27.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.gitea.io/gitea. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.27.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-xmj7-xj85-hfc3 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.