CVE-2026-58511 — gitea
LOWCVE-2026-58511 is a low-severity (CVSS 2.7) Information Exposure vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea. A fix is available for code.gitea.io/gitea — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Webhook Authorization Header Returned in Plaintext via API
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-58511.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-58511 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 383,485 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
code.gitea.io/giteaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The ToHook() function in services/webhook/general.go decrypts the webhook's HeaderAuthorizationEncrypted field and returns the plaintext authorization header in the API response. Any repository admin can read the full plaintext value of webhook authorization headers (Bearer tokens, Basic auth credentials, API keys) set by other admins.
The authorization header is stored encrypted in the database using the server's SecretKey, but ToHook() decrypts it before serializing it into the API response — converting a write-only secret into a readable credential.
Vulnerable Code
File: services/webhook/general.go:407-420
func ToHook(repoLink string, w *webhook_model.Webhook) (*api.Hook, error) {
// ...
authorizationHeader, err := w.HeaderAuthorization() // DECRYPTS from DB
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &api.Hook{
// ...
AuthorizationHeader: authorizationHeader, // PLAINTEXT in response
// ...
}, nil
}
Decryption function: models/webhook/webhook.go:209-216
func (w Webhook) HeaderAuthorization() (string, error) {
if w.HeaderAuthorizationEncrypted == "" {
return "", nil
}
return secret.DecryptSecret(setting.SecretKey, w.HeaderAuthorizationEncrypted)
}
Affected Endpoints
All call ToHook():
GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/hooks(requires repo admin)GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/hooks/{id}(requires repo admin)GET /api/v1/admin/hooks(requires site admin)GET /api/v1/orgs/{org}/hooks(requires org admin)GET /api/v1/user/hooks(requires authenticated user)
Steps to Reproduce
- Admin A creates a webhook with a sensitive authorization header.
- Admin B (different repo admin) lists webhooks via
GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/hooks. - The API response includes the full plaintext authorization header set by Admin A.
Impact
- Cross-admin secret exposure on shared repositories
- Credential harvesting if a repo admin's Gitea token is stolen
- External service compromise via leaked Bearer tokens and API keys
- Undermines the intentional encryption-at-rest protection
Suggested Fix
The authorization header should be write-only. Return a masked/redacted version or a boolean has_authorization_header flag instead.
References
- Vulnerable function:
services/webhook/general.go:392-425 - Decryption function:
models/webhook/webhook.go:209-216 - Verified against commit 19f0169
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.gitea.io/gitea | all versions | 1.27.0go get code.gitea.io/gitea@v1.27.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.gitea.io/gitea, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update code.gitea.io/gitea to 1.27.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-58511 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-58511 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.