`, ``, etc. and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, resulting in cross-site scripting.\n\n### Details\n\nThe affected helpers used case-sensitive regular expressions to detect attempts at closing the surrou","image":"https://o3.security/opengraph.png","datePublished":"2026-04-22T19:55:51Z","dateModified":"2026-05-13T13:54:56.772894Z","url":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41591","inLanguage":"en","author":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41591"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["h1",".vuln-summary",".vuln-severity",".vuln-mitigation"]},"about":[{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"marko","applicationCategory":"npm","softwareVersion":"5.38.36"},{"@type":"SoftwareApplication","name":"@marko/runtime-tags","applicationCategory":"npm","softwareVersion":"6.0.164"}],"citation":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"NVD","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41591"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"OSV.dev","url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41591"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"FIRST.org EPSS","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/api-data?cve=CVE-2026-41591"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","url":"https://github.com/marko-js/marko/security/advisories/GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq"}]}`, ``, etc. and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, resulting in cross-site scripting.\n\n### Details\n\nThe affected helpers used case-sensitive regular expressions to detect attempts at closing the surrou","url":"https://o3.security/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41591","identifier":"CVE-2026-41591","datePublished":"2026-04-22T19:55:51Z","dateModified":"2026-05-13T13:54:56.772894Z","inLanguage":"en","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","keywords":["CVE-2026-41591","MEDIUM severity","CWE-79","CVE","vulnerability","security advisory"],"creator":{"@id":"https://o3.security/#organization"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"citation":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"NVD","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41591"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"OSV.dev","url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41591"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"FIRST.org EPSS","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/api-data?cve=CVE-2026-41591"}],"variableMeasured":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"CVSS Base Score","value":6.4,"description":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Severity","value":"MEDIUM"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EPSS Percentile","value":14}]}`, ``, etc. and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, resulting in cross-site scripting.\n\n### Details\n\nThe affected helpers used case-sensitive regular expressions to detect attempts at closing the surrounding tag:\n\n```js\n// packages/runtime-tags/src/html/content.ts\nconst unsafeScriptReg = /<\\/script/g;"}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How severe is GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq has a CVSS score of 6.4/10, rated MEDIUM. Review your exposure and patch according to your risk tolerance."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which packages are affected by GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq affects the following packages: marko (npm), @marko/runtime-tags (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I fix GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Update marko to 5.38.36 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq is resolved across your whole dependency graph."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I detect GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq in my npm dependencies?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for marko, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do I mitigate GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Is GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq actively exploited in the wild?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the EPSS score for GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.2%, placing it in the 14th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What type of vulnerability is GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq is classified as Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"When was GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq published, and has it been updated?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq was published on April 22, 2026 and was last updated on May 13, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting."}}]}
Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq marko

MEDIUM

GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.4) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in marko. A fix is available for marko — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Marko: XSS via case-insensitive script/style closing tag bypass in runtime HTML escaping

Also known asCVE-2026-41591
Published
Apr 22, 2026
Updated
May 13, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs14th percentile — riskier than 14% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

171other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
markonpm
34Kdownloads / week
@marko/runtime-tagsnpm
3Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

When dynamic text is interpolated into a <script> or <style> tag the Marko runtime failed to prevent tag breakout when the closing tag used non-lowercase casing. An attacker able to place input inside a <script> or <style> block could break out of the tag with </SCRIPT>, </Style>, etc. and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, resulting in cross-site scripting.

Details

The affected helpers used case-sensitive regular expressions to detect attempts at closing the surrounding tag:

// packages/runtime-tags/src/html/content.ts
const unsafeScriptReg = /<\/script/g;
const unsafeStyleReg  = /<\/style/g;

// packages/runtime-class/src/runtime/html/helpers/escape-script-placeholder.js
const unsafeCharsReg = /<\/script/g;

// packages/runtime-class/src/runtime/html/helpers/escape-style-placeholder.js
const unsafeCharsReg = /<\/style/g;

HTML tag names are case-insensitive in the browser parser, so inputs such as </SCRIPT>, </Script>, or </sTyLe> were not matched by these regexes and passed through the helpers unchanged. A browser rendering the output treats the mixed-case end tag as a valid closing tag, terminating the script or style context, and then parses anything that follows as HTML.

The Marko compiler routes interpolated values inside <script> and <style> tags through these helpers automatically (see native-tag.ts:1080-1085), so application code following the framework's conventions had no way to detect or compensate for the gap.

PoC

$ const userCode = "</SCRIPT><script>alert(1)//";
<script>
  const data = ${JSON.stringify(userCode)};
</script>

Would yield the following:

<script>const data = "</SCRIPT><script>alert(1)//";</script>

Which is then parsed in any WHATWG-compliant browser as:

<script>const data = "</script>
<script>alert(1)//";</script>

Impact

Cross-site scripting. Any Marko template that explicitly interpolates untrusted data inside a <script> or <style> block is affected.

Stored XSS is trivial if the value originates from any persisted user input (username, profile bio, comment body, etc.) that is later embedded in a script tag during rendering. Exploitation yields arbitrary JavaScript execution in the victim's browser, enabling session token theft, account takeover, and arbitrary actions as the victim.

Since the internal _escape_script and _escape_style helpers are the framework's designated defense against script/style tag breakout, applications following standard Marko patterns had no obvious reason to add a second layer of sanitization.

This does not affect scripts or hydration state serialized by Marko itself — only templates that explicitly interpolate untrusted values inside a <script> or <style> tag.

Patch

Commit 19d4b37d0fix: html script, style, and comment escaping.

- const unsafeScriptReg = /<\/script/g;
+ const unsafeScriptReg = /<\/script/gi;

- const unsafeStyleReg  = /<\/style/g;
+ const unsafeStyleReg  = /<\/style/gi;

The same commit also introduced an _escape_comment helper and corresponding escape-comment-placeholder.js, hardening HTML comment escaping as a related preventative fix. Test fixtures were added under escape-script-case, escape-style-case, and escape-comment.

Workarounds

Upgrade to the patched release. As a short-term mitigation on affected versions, pre-sanitize any untrusted data before it reaches a template position rendered inside a <script> or <style> tag — e.g. normalize </script, </style, and their mixed-case variants before interpolation, or avoid direct interpolation of untrusted values inside these tags entirely.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmmarkoall versions5.38.36npm install marko@5.38.36
📦npm@marko/runtime-tagsall versions6.0.164npm install @marko/runtime-tags@6.0.164

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for marko, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update marko to 5.38.36 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary When dynamic text is interpolated into a `<script>` or `<style>` tag the Marko runtime failed to prevent tag breakout when the closing tag used non-lowercase casing. An attacker able to place input inside a `<script>` or `<style>` block could break out of the tag with `</SCRIPT>`, `</Style>`, etc. and inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript, resulting in cross-site scripting. ### Details The affected helpers used case-sensitive regular expressions to detect attempts at closing the surrounding tag: ```js // packages/runtime-tags/src/html/content.ts const unsafeScriptReg = /<\/script/g;
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-x9fj-57fh-c8wq: marko (Medium 6.4) | O3 Security