Bypassing Brute Force Protection via Application Crash and In-Memory Data LossGHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv
CRITICALFix: argoproj/argo-cd@17b0df1GHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-307 vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2. A fix is available for github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An attacker can exploit a chain of vulnerabilities, including a Denial of Service (DoS) flaw and in-memory data storage weakness, to effectively bypass the application's brute force login protection. This makes the application susceptible to brute force attacks, compromising the security of all user accounts.
Details
The issue arises from two main vulnerabilities:
- The application crashes due to a previously described DoS vulnerability caused by unsafe array modifications in a multi-threaded environment.
- The application saves the data of failed login attempts in-memory, without persistent storage. When the application crashes and restarts, this data is lost, resetting the brute force protections.
// LoginAttempts is a timestamped counter for failed login attempts
type LoginAttempts struct {
// Time of the last failed login LastFailed time.Time `json:"lastFailed"` // Number of consecutive login failures FailCount int `json:"failCount"`
}
By chaining these vulnerabilities, an attacker can circumvent the limitations placed on the number of login attempts.
PoC
- Run the provided PoC script.
- Observe that the script makes 6 login attempts, one more than the set limit of 5 failed attempts.
- This is made possible because the script triggers a server restart via the DoS vulnerability after 5 failed attempts, thus resetting the counter for failed login attempts.
Impact
This is a critical security vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass the brute force login protection mechanism. Not only can they crash the service affecting all users, but they can also make unlimited login attempts, increasing the risk of account compromise.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 | all versions | 2.8.13go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2@v2.8.13 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 | ≥ 2.9.0&&< 2.9.9 | 2.9.9go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2@v2.9.9 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 | ≥ 2.10.0&&< 2.10.4 | 2.10.4go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2@v2.10.4 |
Affected Products
argo cdargoprojDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2 to 2.8.13 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.10 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.10.4-1 | RHSA-2024:1700 |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.11 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.11.3-2 | RHSA-2024:1697 |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.12 | openshift-gitops-argocd-cli-0:1.12.1-5.el8 | RHSA-2024:1752 |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.12 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.12.1-1 | RHSA-2024:1753 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-x32m-mvfj-52xv in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.