How severe is GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 has a CVSS score of 10/10, rated CRITICAL. Immediate patching is strongly recommended.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 affects the following packages: @vrite/sdk (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

Update @vrite/sdk to 0.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @vrite/sdk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 actively exploited in the wild?

Yes. There are 1 known exploit references for GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9, including 1 in-the-wild exploitation observed on GitHub and other sources. Treat this as actively exploitable and prioritize patching immediately. All exploit code should only be run in an isolated sandbox environment for research or authorized testing — never against production systems without explicit written authorization.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.8%, placing it in the 53th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9?

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 is classified as Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure.

When was GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 was published on October 13, 2023 and was last updated on November 8, 2023. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9

CRITICAL

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in vriteio/vrite

Also known asCVE-2023-5572

Published

Oct 13, 2023

Updated

Nov 8, 2023

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk53th percentile+0.61%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

@vrite/sdknpm

96downloads / week

Description

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository vriteio/vrite prior to 0.3.0.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`@vrite/sdk`	all versions	0.3.0

Exploits & PoCs

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository vriteio/vrite pr…

huntr.devNVDOct 2023

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @vrite/sdk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @vrite/sdk to 0.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GitHub repository vriteio/vrite prior to 0.3.0.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-w35p-wxwj-rcm9 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works