Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv langsmith

MEDIUM

GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Information Exposure vulnerability in langsmith. A fix is available for langsmith — see the affected versions and patch details below.

LangSmith SDK: Streaming token events bypass output redaction

Also known asCVE-2026-41182PYSEC-2026-2583
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs12th percentile — riskier than 12% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

188other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
langsmithnpm
4.7Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The LangSmith SDK's output redaction controls (hideOutputs in JS, hide_outputs in Python) do not apply to streaming token events. When an LLM run produces streaming output, each chunk is recorded as a new_token event containing the raw token value. These events bypass the redaction pipeline entirely — prepareRunCreateOrUpdateInputs (JS) and _hide_run_outputs (Python) only process the inputs and outputs fields on a run, never the events array. As a result, applications relying on output redaction to prevent sensitive LLM output from being stored in LangSmith will still leak the full streamed content via run events.

Details

Both JS and Python SDKs are affected. The same pattern exists in both:

  • JS SDK: traceable.ts:997-1003 and traceable.ts:1044-1050
  • Python SDK: run_helpers.py:1924 and run_helpers.py:1996

In both SDKs, new_token events with raw kwargs.token values are added during streaming, and the redaction pipeline (hideOutputs in JS, hide_outputs in Python) only processes inputs/outputs — never events.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmlangsmithall versions0.5.19npm install langsmith@0.5.19
🐍PyPIlangsmithall versions0.7.31pip install --upgrade 'langsmith==0.7.31'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langsmith, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langsmith to 0.5.19 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The LangSmith SDK's output redaction controls (hideOutputs in JS, hide_outputs in Python) do not apply to streaming token events. When an LLM run produces streaming output, each chunk is recorded as a new_token event containing the raw token value. These events bypass the redaction pipeline entirely — prepareRunCreateOrUpdateInputs (JS) and _hide_run_outputs (Python) only process the inputs and outputs fields on a run, never the events array. As a result, applications relying on output redaction to prevent sensitive LLM output from being stored in LangSmith will still leak the full
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv across npm, PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-rr7j-v2q5-chgv: langsmith (Medium 5.3) | O3 Security