JWT audience claim is not verifiedGHSA-q9hr-j4rf-8fjc
CRITICALGHSA-q9hr-j4rf-8fjc is a critical-severity (CVSS 9) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-cd. A fix is available for github.com/argoproj/argo-cd — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-q9hr-j4rf-8fjc.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/argoproj/argo-cd🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-cd🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-cd🐹github.com/argoproj/argo-cdReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
All versions of Argo CD starting with v1.8.2 are vulnerable to an improper authorization bug causing the API to accept certain invalid tokens.
OIDC providers include an aud (audience) claim in signed tokens. The value of that claim specifies the intended audience(s) of the token (i.e. the service or services which are meant to accept the token). Argo CD does validate that the token was signed by Argo CD's configured OIDC provider. But Argo CD does not validate the audience claim, so it will accept tokens that are not intended for Argo CD.
If Argo CD's configured OIDC provider also serves other audiences (for example, a file storage service), then Argo CD will accept a token intended for one of those other audiences. Argo CD will grant the user privileges based on the token's groups claim, even though those groups were not intended to be used by Argo CD.
This bug also increases the blast radius of a stolen token. If an attacker steals a valid token for a different audience, they can use it to access Argo CD.
Patches
A patch for this vulnerability has been released in the following Argo CD versions:
- v2.6.0-rc5
- v2.5.8
- v2.4.20
- v2.3.14
The patch introduces a new allowedAudiences to the OIDC config block. By default, the client ID is the only allowed audience. Users who want Argo CD to accept tokens intended for a different audience may use allowedAudiences to specify those audiences.
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: argocd-cm
data:
oidc.config: |
name: Example
allowedAudiences:
- audience-1
- audience-2
- argocd-client-id # If `allowedAudiences` is non-empty, Argo CD's client ID must be explicitly added if you want to allow it.
``
Even though [the OIDC spec requires the audience claim](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#IDToken), some tokens may not include it. To avoid a breaking change in a patch release, versions < 2.6.0 of Argo CD will skip the audience claim check for tokens that have no audience. In versions >= 2.6.0, Argo CD will reject all tokens which do not have an audience claim. Users can opt into the old behavior by setting an option:
```yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: argocd-cm
data:
oidc.config: |
name: Example
skipAudienceCheckWhenTokenHasNoAudience: true
Workarounds
There is no workaround besides upgrading.
Credits
The Argo CD team would like to express their gratitude to Vladimir Pouzanov (@farcaller) from Indeed, who discovered the issue, reported it confidentially according to our guidelines, and actively worked with the project to provide a remedy. Many thanks to Vladimir!
References
- How to configure OIDC in Argo CD
- OIDC spec section discussing the audience claim
- JWT spec section discussing the audience claim
For more information
- Open an issue in the Argo CD issue tracker or discussions
- Join us on Slack in channel #argo-cd
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | ≥ 1.8.2&&< 2.3.14 | 2.3.14go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd@v2.3.14 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | ≥ 2.4.0&&< 2.4.20 | 2.4.20go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd@v2.4.20 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | ≥ 2.5.0&&< 2.5.8 | 2.5.8go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd@v2.5.8 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/argoproj/argo-cd | ≥ 2.6.0-rc1&&< 2.6.0-rc5 | 2.6.0-rc5go get github.com/argoproj/argo-cd@v2.6.0-rc5 |
Affected Products
argo cdargoprojDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/argoproj/argo-cd, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/argoproj/argo-cd to 2.3.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-q9hr-j4rf-8fjc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.5 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.5.9-2 | RHSA-2023:0468 |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.6 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.6.4-3 | RHSA-2023:0466 |
| Red Hat OpenShift GitOps 1.7 | openshift-gitops-1/argocd-rhel8:v1.7.1-2 | RHSA-2023:0467 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-q9hr-j4rf-8fjc in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.