CVE-2026-118777 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) CWE-1321 vulnerability in node-forge. A fix is available for node-forge — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Forge: Prototype Pollution in forge.http cookie handling via a malicious Set-Cookie
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-118777.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-118777 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 398,142 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
node-forgenpmDescription
Summary
The forge.http client stored cookies from Set-Cookie response headers in a plain object keyed by cookie name and path. A malicious server could use the cookie name __proto__ to add properties to Object.prototype, use inherited names such as constructor to add properties to Object, and send an empty cookie value to delete Object.prototype properties. Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1.
Details
client.setCookie() in lib/http.js stored a cookie with client.cookies[cookie.name][cookie.path] = cookie, creating client.cookies[cookie.name] only when !(cookie.name in client.cookies). Both values come from the server's Set-Cookie header via response.getCookies(). Because in also sees inherited properties:
- a cookie named
__proto__skipped the initialization,client.cookies['__proto__']returnedObject.prototype, and the cookie path was written as a newObject.prototypeproperty, visible on every object; - a cookie named
constructorwrote onto the globalObjectfunction the same way; - a cookie with an empty value calls
client.removeCookie(name, path), which used the sameinchecks and thendelete client.cookies[name][path], soSet-Cookie: __proto__=; path=toStringdeletedObject.prototype.toString. This path skipped the cookie's secure-flag and domain checks, so it also worked forhttp://clients.
forge.http is not loaded by require('node-forge'). It is included in the forge.all browser bundle and is used with a socket pool, for example by forge.xhr.
The fix uses own-property checks for the cookie store and ignores cookies named __proto__ or with the path __proto__.
Patches
Fixed in node-forge 1.4.1. Cookies from a server can no longer add or remove properties of Object.prototype or Object.
Workarounds
Don't use forge.http or forge.xhr with servers that aren't trusted, or filter Set-Cookie headers named __proto__, constructor or other Object.prototype property names before they reach the client.
Credits
Reported by @arunmozhivarman-dtx and @Dremig.
Proof of concept
A server response for a forge.http client (http.createClient({url: 'https://...', socketPool: ...})) containing:
Set-Cookie: __proto__=evil; path=polluted
On 1.4.0, after the client processes the response, ({}).polluted is the cookie object. With Set-Cookie: __proto__=; path=toLocaleString, Object.prototype.toLocaleString is deleted (for http:// and https:// clients). On 1.4.1 these cookies are ignored and Object.prototype is unchanged.
Regression tests are in tests/security/ghsa-6wvx-3r32-xmcg.js.
Impact
Applications that use the forge.http client (directly, or through forge.xhr in the forge.all browser bundle) against a server that can be malicious are affected. The server can add properties to Object.prototype and Object for the whole JavaScript realm, which can change application logic that reads properties from plain objects, and can delete built-in Object.prototype methods, breaking the page or process. Applications that don't use forge.http are not affected.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | node-forge | all versions | 1.4.1npm install node-forge@1.4.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for node-forge, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update node-forge to 1.4.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-118777 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-118777 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.