GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq
GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq is a Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in github.com/containerd/containerd/v2. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
containerd image-triggered runtime DoS via unbounded group parsing
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/containerd/containerd/v2🐹github.com/containerd/containerd🐹github.com/containerd/containerd/v2🐹github.com/containerd/containerd/v2🐹github.com/containerd/containerd/v2Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
A vulnerability in containerd allows a maliciously crafted image to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. When creating a container from this image, memory exhaustion occurs, leading to an Out Of Memory (OOM) kill of the containerd process. This renders the container runtime API unavailable and can disrupt clients such as the Docker Engine or Kubernetes control-plane components.
Patches
This bug has been fixed in the following containerd versions:
- 2.3.2
- 2.2.5
- 2.1.9
- 2.0.10
- 1.7.33
Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue.
Workarounds
Ensure that only trusted images are used and that only trusted users have permissions to import images or schedule pods.
Credits
The containerd project would like to thank Jakub Ciolek (@jake-ciolek) at AlphaSense and Kyle Elliott @ Trail of Bits who independently discovered and responsibly disclosed this issue in accordance with the containerd security policy.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in containerd
- Email us at [email protected]
To report a security issue in containerd:
- Report a new vulnerability
- Email us at [email protected]
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.0.10 | 2.0.10 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/containerd/containerd | ≥ 1.7.0&&< 1.7.33 | 1.7.33 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 | ≥ 2.1.0&&< 2.1.9 | 2.1.9 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.2.5 | 2.2.5 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 | ≥ 2.3.0&&< 2.3.2 | 2.3.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/containerd/containerd/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/containerd/containerd/v2 to 2.0.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat's container platform uses CRI-O as its container runtime interface, not containerd. While containerd libraries are bundled in some images for OCI image operations (e.g., estargz support via skopeo), the containerd daemon and its CRI plugin (where the vulnerable group-parsing code path exists) are not executed.…
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-jpcc-p29g-p8mq across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.